Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Accounting of public preferences and valuation of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystem services restoration

Evidence from Northwestern China

Bibliographic Data

ID15067375
AuthorsMuhammad Ali (0009-0001-0662-7117, Shaanxi Normal University), Muhammad Abu Sufyan Ali (0000-0002-6233-7448, International Business School, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, China), Zhihe Zhang (0000-0003-0912-7510, International Business School, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, China, corresponding author), Sufyan Ullah Khan (0009-0003-2855-5163, University of Stavanger), Arshad Ahmad Khan (Northwest A&F University), Mohammad Musa (0000-0003-2684-2938, International Business School, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, China), Preethu Rahman (0000-0002-4853-6811, International Business School, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, China), Yousaf Hayat (Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan)
Year2023
Volume36
Issue1
Publication date2023-03-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEconomic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1331-677X • E-ISSN: 1848-9664
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1331677x.2023.2180055
OpenAlexW4323667263
LanguageEN
References cited52

The emphasis of current study is on the assessment of households’ willingness to pay (WTP) and preference heterogeneity for the upgradation of degraded terrestrial and aquatic ecosystem services across sub-basins of Heihe River. A sum of 1679 households were interviewed through choice experiment, and random parameter logit model is applied for welfare estimation. The estimated results signified the importance of selected terrestrial and aquatic ecological attributes. Sampled respondents of upper and middle basins placed highest WTP for reducing the emission of greenhouse gases among all other attributes and the WTP amount was 99.27 and 66.49 Yuan/Year respectively. Whereas in lower basin, improvement in landscape of farmland was highly valued, i.e., 107 Yuan/Year. In terrestrial ecosystem services the lowest WTP was recorded for Ejinaqi oasis size in all sub basins. In aquatic ecosystem services, improving water quality was the most valued attribute in all sub basins, and the corresponding WTP values are 122.81, 99.87 and 177.43 Yuan/Year in upper, middle and lower basins respectively, which ensure the significance of water quality in the entire basin. In aquatic ecosystem services the lowest WTP amount was recorded for leisure and entertainment conditions in each sub basin

Biology · Business · China · Economics · Ecosystem · Ecosystem health · Ecosystem services · Ecosystem valuation · Environmental resource management · Geography · Natural resource economics · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Environmental Science · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Accounting · Ecology

  • Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques

    Ian J Bateman, Richard T Carson et al.•Economic Valuation with Stated…•2002

  • Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities

    Open Access•Wiktor Adamowicz, Jordan J Louviere et al.•Journal of Environmental…•1994

  • Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment

    Open Access•Nick Hanley, Robert E Wright et al.•Environmental and Resource…•1998

  • Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity

    Open Access•Andrea J Reid, Andrew K Carlson et al.•Biological Reviews•2019

  • On the spatial relationship between ecosystem services and urbanization

    Open Access•Yan Zhang, Yanfang Liu et al.•The Science of The Total…•2018

  • On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities

    Itzhak Krinsky, A Leslie Robb•The Review of Economics and…•1986

  • Determining the willingness to pay for ecosystem service restoration in a degraded coastal watershed

    Open Access•Kristina Nicosia, Suhrudh Daaram et al.•Ecological Economics•2014

  • Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin

    Open Access•John B Loomis, John Loomis et al.•Ecological Economics•2000

  • Choice modelling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation

    Open Access•J Rolfe, Jeff Bennett et al.•Ecological Economics•2000

  • Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management

    Open Access•Bruna Grizzetti, Denis Lanzanova et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2016

  • Preferences and values for afforestation

    Open Access•Vincent Upton, Áine Ní Dhubháin et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2012

  • The aggregation of environmental benefit values

    Open Access•Ian J Bateman, Brett Day et al.•Ecological Economics•2006

  • Underuse of social-ecological systems

    Open Access•Volker Mauerhofer, Tomohiro Ichinose et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Poor quality water utilization for agricultural production

    Open Access•Ajay Singh•Land Use Policy•2015

  • Should we pay, and to whom, for biodiversity enhancement in private forests? An empirical study of attitudes towards payments for forest ecosystem services in Poland

    Open Access•Anna Bartczak, Katarzyna Metelska‐szaniawska et al.•Land Use Policy•2015

  • Valuing Coral Reefs

    Liam M Carr, Liam Carr et al.•AMBIO•2003

  • A New Approach to Consumer Theory

    Kelvin Lancaster, Kelvin J Lancaster•Journal of Political Economy•1966

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae