Role of public and private investments for green economic recovery in the post-Covid-19
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15068375 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Xiaoqing Dai (0000-0002-1957-1060, Nanjing Vocational University of Industry Technology, Nanjing, China), Fangping Rao (0000-0002-6828-6944, School of Public Administration, Nanjing University of Finance & Economics, Nanjing, China, corresponding author), Zhen Liu (0000-0002-8440-2554, School of Business Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China), Muhammad Mohsin (0000-0002-4723-4184, Jiangsu University), Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary (0000-0001-5446-7093, Tokai University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1146-1166 |
| Publication date | 2023-03-31 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1331-677X • E-ISSN: 1848-9664 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1331677x.2022.2081865 |
| OpenAlex | W4282979776 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 80 |
This study evaluates the outlook of government expenditure through public and private financing for the green economic revitalization after COVID-19 in Canada. The various econometric estimations are used to measure the impact of government expenditure on green economic recovery. The implementation of public investment is explicitly associated with private funding. The results suggest that the government policy incentives and non-government financing influence fossil fuel energy sources proportions on non-government investment, which is additional than the feed-in tariffs. According to fixed effects results, the distribution of fossil fuel energy sources is an essential obstacle in solar energy investment. In contrast, the presence of varied types of renewable energy encourages non-government climate investment. Throughout the study period after the breakout of the pandemic phase, neither fossil fuel energy sources nor economic policy is marginally efficient. The different macroeconomic programs in green economic recovery might be ideal for attaining the needed impact. The critical policy conclusion of the results of this research is that an influential role of the public and private investment may be part of an optimal firm innovation plan for green economic recovery in the post-COVID-19 period
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Business · Disease · Economic recovery · Economics · Macroeconomics · Outbreak · Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Medicine · Virology
Human Capital efficiency and equity funds’ performance during the Covid-19 pandemic
Price reaction, volatility timing and funds’ performance during Covid-19
Public spending and green economic growth in BRI region
Impact of Covid-19 on corporate solvency and possible policy responses in the EU
The impact of human capital efficiency on Latin American mutual funds during Covid-19 outbreak
The way to induce private participation in green finance and investment
Covid-19 and asset management in EU
The impact of fossil fuel divestments and energy transitions on mutual funds performance
Prioritizing and overcoming biomass energy barriers
How Covid-19 has shaken the sharing economy? An analysis using Google trends data
A bird's eye view of Ghana's renewable energy sector environment
Cyclical fluctuations of economic growth and monetary policy in Nigeria
Spatial spillovers and threshold effects of internet development and entrepreneurship on green innovation efficiency in China
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |