Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Population health impacts from the taxation of salt and sugar in the United Kingdom

Bibliographic Data

ID15091988
AuthorsPatricia Eustachio Colombo (0000-0002-8505-116X, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, corresponding author), James Milner (0000-0002-1461-4615, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), Silvia Pastorino (0000-0001-6679-4702, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), Rosemary Green (0000-0001-5850-6715, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine)
Year2025
Volume28
Issue1
Pagese153-e153
Publication date2025-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Health Nutrition (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1368-9800 • E-ISSN: 1475-2727
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1368980025100967
PMID40859903
OpenAlexW4413740732
LanguageEN
References cited37

Objective: To estimate the potential health benefits from the reduction in consumption of salt and sugar following the introduction of a proposed tax on salt and sugar in the United Kingdom (UK). Design: Epidemiological modelling study. Life table modelling was used to estimate the expected population health benefits from the reduction in consumption of salt and sugar for four scenarios, each reflecting different manufacturer and consumer responses the proposed tax. Relative risks for twenty-four disease–risk pairs were applied, exploring different pathways between salt and sugar consumption, and mortality and morbidity. Setting: UK. Participants: Population of the UK. Results: The results show that life expectancy in the UK could be increased by 1·7 (0·3–3·6) to 4·9 (1·0–9·4) months, depending on the degree of industry and consumer response to the tax. The tax could also lead to up to nearly 2 (0·4–3·6) million fewer cases of preventable chronic diseases and an increase of as much as 3·5 (0·8–6·4) million years of life gained. The largest health benefits would accrue from reduced mortality and morbidity from CVD. Conclusions: Significant benefits to population health could be expected from extending the current tax on sugar-sweetened beverages to other sugary foods and from adding a tax on foods high in salt. The proposed dietary changes are likely to be insufficient to reach national public health targets; hence, additional measures to reduce the burden of chronic disease in the UK will be equally critical to consider

Biology · Environmental health · Geography · Kingdom · Population · Population health · Sugar · Chemistry · Medicine · Social Issues and Policies · Food Science

  • Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight

    Open Access•Kathleen D Hall, Kevin D Hall et al.•The Lancet•2011

  • Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017

    Open Access•Ashkan Afshin, Patrick John Sur et al.•The Lancet•2019

  • Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019

    Open Access•Theo Vos, Stephen S Lim et al.•The Lancet•2020

  • Potential health impact of increasing adoption of sustainable dietary practices in Sweden

    Open Access•Emma Patterson, Patricia Eustachio Colombo et al.•BMC Public Health•2021

  • A workplace feasibility study of the effect of a minimal fruit intervention on fruit intake

    Open Access•Sevil Alinia, Anne Dahl Lassen et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2011

  • Did the junk food tax make the Hungarians eat healthier

    Open Access•Alina Biro•Food Policy•2015

  • Taxes, labels, or nudges? Public acceptance of various interventions designed to reduce sugar intake

    Open Access•Désirée Hagmann, Michael Siegrist et al.•Food Policy•2018

  • Life table methods for quantitative impact assessments in chronic mortality

    Brian G Miller, J F Hurley•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2003

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae