Nutritional disorders in the proposed 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases
Feedback from a survey of stakeholders
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15094251 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mercedes De Onís (World Health Organization, corresponding author), Julia Zeitlhuber (University of Vienna), Cecilia Martínez-Costa, Cecilia Martínez‐Costa (0000-0003-1347-7521, Universitat de València) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 17 |
| Pages | 3135-3141 |
| Publication date | 2016-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Health Nutrition (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1368-9800 • E-ISSN: 1475-2727 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1368980016001427 |
| PMID | 27293047 |
| OpenAlex | W2422914921 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 2 |
Objective To receive stakeholders’ feedback on the new structure of the Nutritional Disorders section of the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11). Design A twenty-five-item survey questionnaire on the ICD-11 Nutritional Disorders section was developed and sent out via email. The international online survey investigated participants’ current use of the ICD and their opinion of the new structure being proposed for ICD-11. The LimeSurvey ® software was used to conduct the survey. Summary statistical analyses were performed using the survey tool. Setting Worldwide. Subjects Individuals subscribed to the mailing list of the WHO Department of Nutrition for Health and Development. Results Seventy-two participants currently using the ICD, mainly nutritionists, public health professionals and medical doctors, completed the questionnaire (response rate 16 %). Most participants ( n 69) reported the proposed new structure will be a useful improvement over ICD-10 and 78 % ( n 56) considered that all nutritional disorders encountered in their work were represented. Overall, participants expressed satisfaction with the comprehensiveness, clarity and life cycle approach. Areas identified for improvement before ICD-11 is finalized included adding some missing disorders, more clarity on the transition to new terminology, links to other classifications and actions to address the disorders. Conclusions The Nutritional Disorders section being proposed for ICD-11 offers significant improvements compared with ICD-10. The new taxonomy and inclusion of currently missing entities is expected to enhance the classification and health-care professionals’ accurate coding of the full range of nutritional disorders throughout the life cycle
CLARITY · Family medicine · Public health · Terminology · Chronic Disease Management Strategies · Genomics and Rare Diseases · Medical Coding and Health Information · Medicine · Nursing
| Citations per year | 0.14 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2019 - 2019 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |