Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Toddler foods, children’s foods

Assessing sodium in packaged supermarket foods targeted at children

Bibliographic Data

ID15094271
AuthorsCharlene Elliott (0000-0003-2615-2144, University of Calgary, corresponding author), Charlene D Elliott, Martin J Conlon (University of Calgary)
Year2011
Volume14
Issue3
Pages490-498
Publication date2011-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Health Nutrition (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1368-9800 • E-ISSN: 1475-2727
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1368980010001990
PMID20624338
OpenAlexW2141825387
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited2

Objective To critically examine child-oriented packaged food products sold in Canada for their sodium content, and to assess them light of intake recommendations, the current policy context and suggested targets. Design Baby/toddler foods ( n 186) and child-oriented packaged foods ( n 354) were coded for various attributes (including sodium). Summary statistics were created for sodium, then the children’s food products were compared with the UK Food Standards Agency (FSA) ‘targets’ for sodium in packaged foods. Also assessed were the products’ per-serving sodium levels were assessed in light of the US Institute of Medicine’s dietary reference intakes and Canada’s Food Guide. Setting Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Subjects None. Results Twenty per cent of products could be classified as having high sodium levels. Certain sub-categories of food (i.e. toddler entrées, children’s packaged lunches, soups and canned pastas) were problematic. Significantly, when scaled in according to Schedule M or viewed in light of the serving sizes on the Nutrition Facts table, the sodium level in various dry goods products generally fell within, and below, the Adequate Intake (AI)/Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) band for sodium. When scaled in accordance with the UK FSA targets, however, none of the (same) products met the targets. Conclusions In light of AI/UL thresholds based on age and per-serving cut-offs, packaged foodstuffs for youngsters fare relatively well, with the exception of some problematic areas. ‘Stealth sodium’ and ‘subtle sodium’ are important considerations; so is use of the FSA’s scaling method to evaluate sodium content, because it is highly sensitive to the difference between the reference amount and the actual real-world serving size for the product being considered

Context (archaeology · Developmental psychology · Dietary Sodium · Environmental health · Geography · Nutrition Labeling · Sodium · Toddler · Chemistry · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Medicine · Psychology · Sodium Intake and Health · Food Science

  • Child-targeted on-pack communications in Belgian supermarkets

    Open Access•Goele Aerts, Tim Smits•Health Promotion International•2019

  • Sodium content and food additives in major brands of Brazilian children’s foods

    Open Access•Antônio Zenon Antunes Teixeira•Ciência & Saúde Coletiva•2018

  • Marketing foods to children

    Open Access•Amelia Lythgoe, Caireen Roberts et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2013

  • Assessment of diet and physical activity

    Open Access•Agneta Yngve, Marilyn Tseng et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2011

  • Sodium content on processed foods for snacks

    Open Access•Mariana Vieira dos Santos Kraemer, Renata Carvalho de Oliveira et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2016

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2011 - 2019 (9)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae