Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Homemade infant formula recipes may contain harmful ingredients

A quantitative content analysis of blogs

Bibliographic Data

ID15095646
AuthorsSutton A Davis (Regional Health), Linda L Knol (0000-0001-7347-4854, University of Alabama, corresponding author), Kristi M Crowe-White, Kristi Crowe‐White (0000-0003-2497-4582, University of Alabama), Lori W Turner (0000-0001-6726-5423, University of Alabama), Erin McKinley (0000-0002-4864-2606, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center)
Year2020
Volume23
Issue8
Pages1334-1339
Publication date2020-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Health Nutrition (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1368-9800 • E-ISSN: 1475-2727
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s136898001900421x
PMID32157977
OpenAlexW3011940309
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited13

Objective: When breast-feeding is not possible, commercially made human milk substitute is recommended. Some consumers would prefer to make their own homemade infant formula (HIF) and may seek information on this practice from internet sources. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the content of blogs posting HIF recipes. Design: Blog postings were identified through a comprehensive search conducted using the Google search engine and the following search terms along with the term ‘blog’: ‘Make Your Own Baby Formula’, ‘Homemade Baby Formula’, ‘Do It Yourself (DIY) Baby Formula’, ‘DIY Baby Formula’, ‘Baby Formula Recipe’ and ‘All Natural Baby Formula’. A quantitative content analysis of blogs offering recipes for HIF was completed. Blogs that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed for disclaimers, blogger’s credentials, rationale for HIF use, advertisement or sale of recipe ingredients and recipe ingredients. Setting: Worldwide Web. Results: Fifty-nine blogs, featuring one hundred forty-four recipes, met inclusion criteria. Among reviewed blogs, 33·9 % did not provide a disclaimer stating breast milk is the preferred option, 25·4 % recommended consulting a healthcare professional before using, and 76·3 % and 20·3 % either advertised or sold ingredients or recipe kits, respectively. Credentials of bloggers varied and only seven bloggers identified themselves as ‘nutritionists’. The three most frequently mentioned recipe ingredients were whole raw cow’s milk (24·3 %), raw goat’s milk (23·6 %) and liver (14·5 %). Conclusions: Clinicians should be aware of this trend, discuss source of formula with parents, advocate for appropriate infant feeding practices and monitor for side effects

Advertising · Breast milk · Business · Disclaimer · Inclusion (mineral · Infant formula · Political science · Recipe · The Internet · World Wide Web · Breastfeeding Practices and Influences · Computer Science · Infant Health and Development · Medicine · Pediatric health and respiratory diseases · Psychology · Food Science · Pediatrics

  • ‘You Are Not Alone, We’ve Got You’

    Open Access•Panagiota Tragantzopoulou, Alison Fixsen et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2024

  • Content quality versus sharing practices on social media

    Open Access•Cassandra H Ellis, Peter Ho et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2025

  • Content analysis

    Klaus Krippendorff•Content analysis•1980

  • High-protein goat’s milk diet identified through newborn screening

    Open Access•Evelina Maines, Giorgia Gugelmo et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2017

Unique citing works2
Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae