Perception of needs and responses in food security

Divergence between households and stakeholders

Datos Bibliográficos

ID15096239
AutoresAnne-Marie Hamelin (0000-0001-8662-2043), Anne‐Marie Hamelin (Université Laval, autor de correspondencia), Céline Mercier (0000-0002-4782-1530, Université de Montréal), Annie Bédard (Université Laval)
Año2008
Volumen11
Número12
Páginas1389-1396
Fecha de publicación2008-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPublic Health Nutrition (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1368-9800 • E-ISSN: 1475-2727
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1368980008003406
PMID18761760
OpenAlexW2113155502
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas13
Referencias citadas29

Objectives The aim of the study was (i) to describe the needs of food-insecure households and their assessment of community programmes, as expressed by households and perceived by stakeholders; and (ii) to examine the similarities and differences between households’ and stakeholders’ perceptions in Quebec City area. Design/setting/subjects A semi-structured interview and sociodemographic questionnaire with fifty-five households and fifty-nine stakeholders (community workers, managers, donor agencies). The transcriptions were subjected to content analysis and inter-coder reliability measurement. Results The respondents’ perceptions converge towards three main categories of needs: needs specific to food security, conditions necessary for achieving food security and related needs. There was agreement on the necessity of better financial resources, although the impact of financial resources alone may be uncertain in the opinion of some stakeholders. Different perceptions of needs and of their fulfilment by community programmes emerge between both groups. Despite households found positive aspects, they complained that quality of food and access were major needs neglected. Their account suggests overall a partial fit between the programmes and food security needs; even a combination of programmes (e.g. collective kitchens, purchasing groups, community gardens) was insufficient to adequately meet these needs. In contrast, most stakeholders perceived that the household’s primary need was a basic amount of food and that the households were satisfied with programmes. Conclusions It is urgent to evaluate the overall effect of community programmes on specific aspects of household food insecurity. The results emphasise that community programmes alone cannot bring about social change needed to prevent food insecurity

Agriculture · Business · Food insecurity · Food security · Geography · Needs assessment · Perception · Political science · Purchasing · Quality (philosophy · Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations · Homelessness and Social Issues · Psychology · Urban Agriculture and Sustainability · Marketing