How labelling of commercial infant food impacts parents’ beliefs about sugar content and related purchasing and feeding decisions
A scoping review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15097046 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rana Conway (0000-0003-0955-7107, University College London, corresponding author), Tiffany Denning (University College London), Andrew Steptoe (0000-0001-7808-4943, University College London), Clare Llewellyn (0000-0002-3589-9517, University College London), Clare H Llewellyn (0000-0002-0066-2827, University College London) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | e138-e138 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Health Nutrition (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1368-9800 • E-ISSN: 1475-2727 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1368980025100827 |
| PMID | 40798922 |
| OpenAlex | W4413110267 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 22 |
Objective: To assess what is known about how the labelling of commercial infant food impacts parents’ beliefs about a product’s sugar content and their related purchasing and feeding decisions. Design: Mixed methods scoping review. Peer-reviewed studies were identified from six electronic databases, and grey literature was identified via Google, relevant websites, government reports and by contacting organisations. Searches were completed in May 2024 using a comprehensive search string incorporating keywords and indexed terms related to ‘parents’, ‘beliefs’, ‘sugar’ and ‘baby food labels’. Setting: Northern, Western and Southern Europe, North America, Australia and New Zealand. Participants: Parents and primary caregivers of children (≤ 37 months) or those specifically choosing commercial infant food for their children. Results: In total, 1123 records were screened, and seventeen were included for review, with all records published since 2015. Records reported on fifteen unique studies, including seven quantitative, seven qualitative and one mixed-methods study. Studies found that simply labelling products as suitable for babies elicited a trust that they were healthy, including not having a high sugar content. Interventions alerting parents to the sugar content of products were associated with less positive opinions or reduced intention to purchase. In eleven studies, parents described being drawn to products displaying labels such as ‘no added sugar’, which some perceived as meaning low sugar. In five studies, parents described sugar labelling as misleading, and/or they explicitly expressed a desire for clearer sugar labelling. Conclusions: Parents find the current labelling of commercial infant food misleading and desire clearer labelling to support informed purchasing and feeding decisions
Biology · Business · Environmental health · Food labelling · Labelling · Purchasing · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Medicine · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Psychology · Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods · Food Science · Marketing
Why Are Some Population Interventions for Diet and Obesity More Equitable and Effective Than Others? The Role of Individual Agency
Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols
High sugar content of European commercial baby foods and proposed updates to existing recommendations
Marketing of sugar‐sweetened children's drinks and parents' misperceptions about benefits for young children
Survey of Emotional Themes Used in Marketing of Commercial Baby Foods in the UK—Implications for Nutrition Promotion in Early Childhood
Why do parents use packaged infant foods when starting complementary feeding? Findings from phase one of a longitudinal qualitative study
The big squeeze
Caregivers’ provision of sweetened fruit-flavoured drinks to young children
What shapes parental feeding decisions over the first 18 months of parenting
Do sugar warning labels influence parents’ selection of a labeled snack for their children? A randomized trial in a virtual convenience store
Regulated nutrition claims increase perceived healthiness of an ultra-processed, discretionary toddler snack food and ultra-processed toddler milks
Effects of Sugary Drink Countermarketing Videos on Caregivers’ Attitudes and Intentions to Serve Fruit Drinks and Toddler Milks to Young Children
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |