Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Quality of offspring? Socio-cultural factors, pre-natal testing and reproductive decision-making in Japan

Bibliographic Data

ID15097759
AuthorsMasae Kato (International Institute for Asian Studies, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume12
Issue2
Pages177-189
Publication date2010-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCulture Health & Sexuality (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-1058 • E-ISSN: 1464-5351
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13691050902993676
PMID19557585
OpenAlexW2087699270
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited1

Japan is one of the few countries to have enacted legislation on eugenics. Consequently, there has been active public debate about the practice of selective abortion for over 35 years. Furthermore, discrimination against disabilities is deep-rooted in Japanese society and the quality of offspring is a common concern. Given this background, the obvious conclusion might be that couples in Japan would have no hesitation in using reproductive technologies to ensure the best possible chance of giving birth to higher quality offspring. Yet, research indicates that when it comes to decision-making in the course of a pregnancy, not all individuals choose testing or termination, even when prenatal diagnosis indicates the presence of congenital conditions. Other factors play a role in reproductive decision-making, including age at time of pregnancy and reproductive history including infertility treatment. Against this background, this paper analyses accounts of five pregnancies - two of which resulted in termination and three which went to full term despite receiving test results showing possible birth defects - with the aim of identifying factors influencing whether or not to terminate a pregnancy

Abortion · Assisted reproductive technology · Biology · Developmental psychology · Environmental health · Eugenics · Fertility · Gynecology · Infertility · Legislation · Obstetrics · Offspring · Political science · Population · Pregnancy · Quality (philosophy · Sociology · Test (biology · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Demography · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies

  • So Many Challenges, So Many Regrets

    Open Access•Benan KURT YILMAZ, Ela Burcu Uçel et al.•Gender Issues•2024

  • The decision

    Open Access•Sølvi Marie Risøy, Thorvald Sirnes•BioSocieties•2015

  • Selective Reproductive Technologies

    T M Gammeltoft, Ayo Wahlberg•Annual Review of Anthropology•2014

  • Embodied responsibilities

    Open Access•Ivry Tsipy•Sociology of Health & Illness•2007

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,25
Citation span2014 - 2024 (11)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae