I could see myself doing something like that’
US women’s engagement with characters who experience abortion, adoption and surrogacy on Little Fires Everywhere
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15098048 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephanie Herold (0000-0003-2592-3883, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California, USA, corresponding author), Gretchen Sisson (0000-0002-3900-6923, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California, USA) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 839-854 |
| Publication date | 2024-06-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Culture Health & Sexuality (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-1058 • E-ISSN: 1464-5351 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13691058.2023.2242436 |
| PMID | 37548147 |
| OpenAlex | W4385619911 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 21 |
Building on existing scholarship examining how audiences interpret reproductive experiences on film and television, we investigate how viewers make meaning of representations of motherhood, abortion, adoption, and surrogacy on the Hulu television miniseries Little Fires Everywhere. We recruited twenty-one participants to watch the series and conducted three virtual focus groups of seven women each. Based on the racial identities of the main characters in the series, we segmented these groups by race: one group each of white women, Black women, and Chinese American women. Focus groups were facilitated by moderators who matched the racial and ethnic backgrounds of each group. We asked participants about their overall reactions to the series, their impressions of various characters, and each reproductive health plotline. Participants expressed both tender and critical reactions to characters who endured motherhood, surrogacy and adoption, yet most participants were overtly critical of Lexie, the character who obtained an abortion. We argue that this is likely because the character of Lexie is written as largely unsympathetic, leaving audiences with little opportunity to form a parasocial relationship with her. We discuss the implications of this for cultural conversations and understandings of abortion more broadly
Abortion · Ethnic group · Focus group · Political science · Pregnancy · Scholarship · Sociology · Gender Studies · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Law · Media Influence and Health · Media, Gender, and Advertising · Psychology · Social Psychology
Involved, Transported, or Emotional? Exploring the Determinants of Change in Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior in Entertainment-Education
Prime‐time abortion on Grey's Anatomy
Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2020
Depicting abortion access on American television, 2005–2015
The Baby Makers
Introduction
Speaking of Abortion
Audience Reception Research in a Post-broadcasting Digital Age
All this way, all this money, for a five-minute procedure
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |