Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Towards a better understanding of abortion misinformation in the USA

A review of the literature

Datos Bibliográficos

ID15098486
AutoresAlison J Patev (0000-0001-8814-0259, Virginia Commonwealth University, autor de correspondencia), Kristina B Hood (0000-0003-4817-9882, Virginia Commonwealth University)
Año2021
Volumen23
Número3
Páginas285-300
Fecha de publicación2021-03-04
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaCulture Health & Sexuality (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1369-1058 • E-ISSN: 1464-5351
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13691058.2019.1706001
PMID32202213
OpenAlexW3012590553
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas19
Referencias citadas38

Roughly 20% of women in the USA will seek an abortion during their lifetimes. As abortion is a medical procedure, individuals seeking abortion services must have access to accurate medical information. Inaccurate information about abortion, known as abortion misinformation, adversely affects knowledge about abortion, and may impair informed decision-making. Abortion misinformation has received limited attention in psychological and health research. This review summarises current findings on abortion misinformation from studies of adults in the USA, examines which forms of misinformation are most common, and assesses prominent sources of abortion misinformation. A narrative, integrative approach was adopted focussing on nine articles. Findings suggest that first, inaccurate beliefs about abortion exist among many samples of US adults, including inaccurate connections between abortion and breast cancer, infertility and negative mental health outcomes. Second, abortion misinformation comes from a variety of informational sources, which may render efforts to prevent it challenging. Summarising and extending knowledge of abortion misinformation may be useful first steps to better understanding this phenomenon and may ultimately aid in reduction of abortion misinformation among individuals living in the USA

Abortion · Computer security · Internet privacy · Misinformation · Pregnancy · Computer Science · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Social Psychology

  • Enacting Reproductive Justice

    Catriona Ida Macleod, Yamini Kalyanaraman et al.•International Perspectives in…•2024

  • The club of the discontents

    Open Access•Dafne Calvo, Maria Iranzo-Cabrera et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • Informationen zur reproduktiven Gesundheit in digitalen Medien

    Eva Kubitza, Maika Böhm•Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung•2023

  • Informiertheit von ungewollt schwangeren Frauen mit Abbruch in Deutschland

    Maria Schneider, Sarah Eckardt et al.•Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung•2023

  • “Sometimes banning abortion doesn’t mean fewer abortions or fewer babies die—it just means more women die”

    Open Access•Briana M Trifiro•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2026

  • Prime‐time abortion on Grey's Anatomy

    Open Access•Gretchen Sisson, Nathan Walter et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2021

  • Abortion needs expressed on Reddit after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision in the United States

    Open Access•Jennifer N John, Zelly C Martins•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2024

  • Introduction to the mixed-up politics of disinformation, anti-feminisms, and misogyny

    Michele White•Feminist Media Studies•2024

  • Exposure to Lived Representations of Abortion in Popular Television Program Plotlines on Abortion-Related Knowledge, Attitudes, and Support

    Open Access•Stephanie Herold, Andréa Becker et al.•Sex Roles•2024

  • Heterogeneous attitudinal profiles towards gene editing

    Open Access•Isaac Halstead, Jan R Böhnke et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2023

  • Willing but unable

    Open Access•Elizabeth M Anderson, K Cowan et al.•SSM - Population Health•2021

  • Imagining Coat‐Hangers and Pills

    Open Access•Rosalyn Schroeder, Lori R Freedman et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2025

  • Im Internet gucken heute doch alle“. Eine qualitative Untersuchung zur Bedeutung von Online-Informationen zum Schwangerschaftsabbruch für die Beratungspraxis

    Eva Kubitza, Maika Böhm•Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung•2025

  • Opinions on Public Funding of Abortion Among Medicaid-Eligible Abortion Patients in the United States

    Open Access•Sachiko Ragosta, Laura Fix et al.•Sexuality Research and Social…•2025

  • ‘It made me feel compassion for her as if I was rewatching myself’

    Open Access•Stephanie Herold, Katie Woodruff•Culture Health & Sexuality•2026

  • Abortion information seeking

    Open Access•Orlaith Heymann, Hillary Gyuras et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2026

  • Attitudes regarding the safety of in-clinic and self-managed abortion methods among the US general public in early 2022

    Open Access•Rosalyn Schroeder, Lauren Ralph et al.•Culture Health & Sexuality•2025

  • Perceptions of medication and procedural abortion among medication abortion patients in Mississippi, USA

    Kimberly Kelly•Culture Health & Sexuality•2025

  • Gender as a central site of inquiry within mis- and disinformation studies

    Taylor J Agajanian, Rachel E Moran•Feminist Media Studies•2025

  • Abortion and mental health

    Brenda Major, Mark Appelbaum et al.•American Psychologist•2009

  • Trust and Sources of Health Information

    Bradford W Hesse, David E Nelson et al.•A.M.A. Archives of Internal…•2005

  • Writing Narrative Literature Reviews

    Open Access•Roy F Baumeister, Mark R Leary•Review of General Psychology•1997

  • Do 72-Hour Waiting Periods and Two-Visit Requirements for Abortion Affect Women's Certainty? A Prospective Cohort Study

    Open Access•Sarah C M Robert, Sarah C M Roberts et al.•Women s Health Issues•2017

  • Connecting Knowledge about Abortion and Sexual and Reproductive Health to Belief about Abortion Restrictions

    Open Access•Megan L Kavanaugh, Danielle Bessett et al.•Women s Health Issues•2013

  • State-Mandated (Mis)Information and Women's Endorsement of Common Abortion Myths

    Open Access•Nancy F Berglas, Heather Gould et al.•Women s Health Issues•2017

  • Abortion Stigma

    Open Access•Alison Norris, Danielle Bessett et al.•Women s Health Issues•2011

  • Does state-level context matter for individuals' knowledge about abortion, legality and health? Challenging the ‘red states v. blue states’ hypothesis

    Danielle Bessett, Caitlin Gerdts et al.•Culture Health & Sexuality•2015

  • Barriers to Abortion Care and Their Consequences For Patients Traveling for Services

    Open Access•Jenna Jerman, Lori Frohwirth et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2017

  • Mental Health Diagnoses 3 Years After Receiving or Being Denied an Abortion in the United States

    M Antonia Biggs, John M Neuhaus et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2015

  • Population Group Abortion Rates and Lifetime Incidence of Abortion

    Rachel K Jones, J Jerman•American Journal of Public Health•2022

  • Bias Will Find a Way

    Martin Bisgaard•The Journal of Politics•2015

  • The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion

    Open Access•Toby Bolsen, James N Druckman et al.•Political Behavior•2014

  • Conceptualising abortion stigma

    Anuradha Kumar, Leila Hessini et al.•Culture Health & Sexuality•2009

  • Examining the association of abortion history and current mental health

    Open Access•Julia R Steinberg, Lawrence B Finer•Social Science & Medicine•2011

  • Boomerangs versus Javelins

    Jack Zhou•Environmental Politics•2016

Obras citantes distintas19
Citas por año3,8
Intervalo de citas2021 - 2026 (6)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 19
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae