Enhancing sustainability considerations in construction industry projects
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15112321 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Taofeeq D Moshood (0000-0003-1918-712X, Massey University, corresponding author), James OB Rotimi (0000-0001-6744-4683, Massey University), Wajiha Shahzad (0000-0002-7683-287X, Massey University) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 29287-29313 |
| Publication date | 2024-04-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environment Development and Sustainability (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1387-585X • E-ISSN: 1573-2975 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10668-024-04946-2 |
| OpenAlex | W4396228474 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 89 |
In today’s society, the construction sector significantly influences all three aspects of sustainability: economic, environmental, and social. Industry and academia have recognized sustainability in construction projects as a key concern. The New Zealand government also focuses on providing a sustainable construction sector centred on high performance, high productivity, enhanced innovation, and improving community well-being through a better-built environment. Project management and sustainability are two distinct areas of research. Previous empirical research on the effectiveness of construction project implementation lacked sustainability success components. This research aims to provide criteria for project sustainability success for future performance on construction projects. Based on the existing literature, many economic, environmental, and social sustainability indicators were compiled for consideration at various pipeline project life cycle phases. The information gathered from the Scopus database was analyzed using ATLAS.ti 9 software to create project sustainability success criteria. Pipeline construction projects and sustainability must focus on environmental challenges while managing economic and social advantages. The research investigated sustainable construction adoption, revealing weak awareness among organizations due to limited understanding among key actors like clients, regulatory bodies, and construction organizations. Lack of effective application of sustainability guidelines, inadequate legislation, and building codes were significant hurdles in implementing sustainable practices in the construction sector. The study highlights essential issues to promote sustainable practices in the industry. The study findings suggest that organizations and individual factors are strong predictors for achieving sustainable construction and are vital antecedents leading to greater sustainability adoption. Finally, the study points to construction project managers’ knowledge of how to set up criteria connected to sustainability and how it could affect the outcome of their projects
Architectural engineering · Business · Construction engineering · Construction industry · Sustainability · Construction Project Management and Performance · Engineering · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Project management
Evidence in Management and Organizational Science
Conceptualization of sustainable higher education institutions, roles, barriers, and challenges for sustainability
Ranking of human factors affecting contractors’ risk attitudes in the Malaysian construction industry
An evaluation of sustainable construction perceptions and practices in Singapore
International Principles For Social Impact Assessment
Mountain Forests and Sustainable Development
Plastics at sea
What elements in a sustainability course contribute to paradigm change and action competence? A study at Lincoln University, New Zealand
Reconciling global aspirations and local realities
Investigating the awareness and application of sustainable construction concept by Malaysian developers
Evaluation of project-level environmental impact assessment and SWOT analysis of EIA process in India
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1.5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |