Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How to shape communication for CO2-derived insulation boards considering different accepter profiles

Bibliographic Data

ID15112514
AuthorsLeslie Simons (0000-0002-2253-9053, RWTH Aachen University), Martina Ziefle (0000-0002-6105-4729, RWTH Aachen University, corresponding author), Katrin Arning (0000-0001-8234-1164, RWTH Aachen University)
Year2023
Volume26
Issue10
Pages25367-25396
Publication date2023-09-16
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironment Development and Sustainability (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1387-585X • E-ISSN: 1573-2975
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10668-023-03683-2
OpenAlexW4386806604
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited55

Climate change is a constant global challenge. An approach to help mitigate climate change is carbon capture and utilization (CCU), in which captured CO 2 is reused as raw material for consumer products. Because innovations like CCU are unfamiliar to the general public, their communication is critical for a successful rollout. To date, sustainability innovation research has largely neglected the empirical study of communication. The present study contributes to studying the information and communication needs of laypeople based on perceptions and acceptance patterns for CCU by focusing on acceptance profiles for CCU-based insulation boards. In an empirical two-step approach, a qualitative interview prestudy was followed by a quantitative questionnaire measurement ( N = 643). Using k-means clustering, the respondents were divided into three acceptance groups: rejecters (15%), tentative accepters (51%), and strong accepters (34%). Analysis showed that regarding their demographics and personality traits, tentative accepters and rejecters were similar. All segments trusted science and health experts best, and only the rejecters distrusted some specific actors. Information on the product’s risks and functional properties was most important for all acceptance groups. Based on the study’s insights, both general and targeted managerial communication and policy guidelines were formulated

Business · Demographics · Empirical research · Environmental economics · Knowledge management · Sociology · Sustainability · Computer Science · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Psychology · Risk Perception and Management · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy

  • Who's willing to take the green leap? Consumers' preferences and their willingness to use different carbon capture and utilization products

    Open Access•Wiktoria Wilkowska, Imke Haverkämper et al.•Cleaner and Responsible Consumption•2025

  • An explorative study on consumer perceptions of novel innovative construction material

    Open Access•Jonas Krauss, Klaus Menrad et al.•Cleaner and Responsible Consumption•2025

  • Worlds apart? Investigating acceptance and usage demands of carbon-based cosmetics and clothing across European countries

    Open Access•Wiktoria Wilkowska, Imke Haverkämper et al.•Energy Sustainability and Society•2024

  • Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

    Jacob Cohen•Statistical Power Analysis for…•2013

  • The political logics of clean energy transitions

    Open Access•Hanna L Breetz, Hanna Breetz et al.•Business and Politics•2018

  • A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures

    Open Access•Kashif Abbass, Muhammad Qasim et al.•Environmental Science and…•2022

  • Signaling the Green Sell

    Lucy Atkinson, Saul Rosenthal et al.•Journal of Advertising•2014

  • Public perception of carbon capture and storage (CCS)

    Open Access•Selma L’Orange Seigo, Selma L׳Orange Seigo et al.•Renewable and Sustainable Energy…•2014

  • Free-Market Ideology and Environmental Degradation

    Open Access•Yuko Heath, Robert Gifford•Environment and Behavior•2006

  • Understanding sustainable innovation

    Open Access•Valentina Cillo, Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli et al.•Corporate Social Responsibility…•2019

  • Integrating acceptance-relevant factors into wind power planning

    Open Access•Barbara S Zaunbrecher, Martina Ziefle•Sustainable Cities and Society•2016

  • Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy

    Open Access•Paul Slovic•Risk Analysis•1993

  • Perception of Hazards

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist, George Cvetkovich•Risk Analysis•2000

  • How will I know about local energy projects? A conjoint-analysis of communication preferences in Germany

    Open Access•Johanna Kluge, Julia Offermann et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • Breakthroughs” for a green economy? Financialization and clean energy transition

    Open Access•Sarah Knuth•Energy Research & Social Science•2018

  • Framing Wind Energy

    Keith Joseph Zukas•Mass Communication & Society•2016

  • New Trends in Measuring Environmental Attitudes

    Open Access•Riley E Dunlap, Kent D Van Liere et al.•Journal of Social Issues•2000

Citations per year1.5
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae