Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Fifteen years of ‘Utopia’

Napster and Pitchfork as technologies of democratization

Bibliographic Data

ID15114635
AuthorsDavid Carter (0000-0002-0828-3987, University of Tasmania), I Rogers (0000-0001-6910-5319, MIT University)
Year2014
Publication date2014-10-05
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFirst Monday (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1396-0458 • E-ISSN: 1396-0466
PublisherUniversity of Illinois Libraries (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5210/fm.v19i10.5543
OpenAlexW2085719296
LanguageEN
Citations received18

The legacy of Napster is filled with bold claims that continue to circulate. As recently as 2013, Wired writer Angela Watercutter described the service as “strings of code that forever changed the relationship between technology and music.” In this paper, we set out to problematize this narrative by outlining a seldom–reported pre–history of Napster combined with an expanded examination of the alternative legacies surrounding the platform. One such legacy is the rise of eclectic music criticism portal Pitchfork.com, a media entity (and business model) that similarly traded on a revolutionary backstory

Aesthetics · Art · Clockwork · Criticism · Democracy · Democratization · Literature · Music industry · Narrative · Political science · Sociology · Utopia · Visual arts · Digital Games and Media · History · Law · Music History and Culture · Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media

  • The Australian WEB3 music ‘community’ and the ‘indie’ mainstream

    Open Access•Benjamin A Morgan, Dave Carter et al.•DIY Alternative Cultures & Society•2025

  • Popular Music, Technology, and the Changing Media Ecosystem

    Open Access•Tamas Tofalvy, Emilia Barna•Popular Music, Technology, and…•2020

  • Political online participation and its effects

    Open Access•Dennis Frie, Tobias Escher et al.•Policy & Internet•2021

  • The event and politics

    Matheus Lock•Distinktion Journal of Social…•2021

  • Permanent Campaigning

    Ícaro Joathan, Darren G Lilleker•Journal of Political Marketing•2020

  • Spiraling downward

    Open Access•Tom Dobber, Damian Trilling et al.•New Media & Society•2018

  • On the Erasure of race in control culture discourse

    Eduard Fabregat, Timothy J Beck•Social Identities•2019

  • Community psychology, digital technology, and loss

    Open Access•Catherine H Stein, Jessica Hartl Majcher et al.•Journal of Community & Applied…•2019

  • Facebook and political participation in Cambodia

    Sereyvicheth Chunly•South East Asia Research•2019

  • Rapeable' and 'unrapeable' women

    Maja Brandt Andreasen•Journal of Gender Studies•2021

  • Refining the UN E-participation Index

    Open Access•Yury Kabanov•Government Information Quarterly•2021

  • Governance networks that strengthen older adults' digital inclusion

    Open Access•Roksolana Suchowerska, A Mccosker•Government Information Quarterly•2021

  • Fake online reviews

    Open Access•Yuanyuan Wu, Eric W T Ngai et al.•Decision Support Systems•2020

  • Tents, Tweets, and Events

    Open Access•M Bastos, Marco T Bastos et al.•Journal of Communication•2015

  • Virtuality

    Open Access•Andy Bennett, I Rogers•Popular Music Scenes and Cultural…•2016

  • Paradox of celestial jukebox

    Hyojung Sun•Creative Industries Journal•2019

  • Music and democracy in America

    Open Access•Nancy Weiss Hanrahan•American Journal of Cultural…•2021

  • Negotiating platformisation

    Open Access•Allan Watson, Andrew Leyshon•Journal of Cultural Economy•2022

Unique citing works18
Citations per year1,64
Citation span2015 - 2025 (11)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae