Comparison of content policies for institutional repositories in Australia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15115458 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Arthur Sale, Ahj Sale (0000-0001-7261-8035, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Publication date | 2006-04-03 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | First Monday (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1396-0458 • E-ISSN: 1396-0466 |
| Publisher | University of Illinois Libraries (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5210/fm.v11i4.1324 |
| OpenAlex | W2051055796 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
Seven Australian universities have established institutional repositories (containing research articles, also known as eprints) that can be analyzed for content and which were in operation during 2004 and 2005. This short paper analyses their content and shows that a requirement to deposit research output into a repository coupled with effective author support policies works in Australia and delivers high levels of content. Voluntary deposit policies do not, regardless of any author support by the university. This is consistent with international data
Business · Content analysis · Institutional repository · Social science · Sociology · World Wide Web · Academic Publishing and Open Access · Computer Science · scientometrics and bibliometrics research · Accounting
| Citations per year | 0.14 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2012 - 2012 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |