The Internet, social networking Web sites and political participation research
Assumptions and contradictory evidence
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15115992 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Isidoropaolo Casteltrione (0000-0002-7969-6500, Queen Margaret University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Publication date | 2015-02-25 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | First Monday (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1396-0458 • E-ISSN: 1396-0466 |
| Publisher | University of Illinois Libraries (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5210/fm.v20i3.5462 |
| OpenAlex | W2017788838 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
Over the last decade there has been a proliferation of academic studies addressing the relationship between the Internet and politics, with an increasing number of publications focusing on the impact of such a medium on political participation. Within this specific sub-field research has produced contrasting evidence and generated an intense academic debate. Some scholars stressed the positive impact of the Internet on political participation (i.e., optimists), while others minimised its mobilising power, emphasising its tendency to reinforce existing participatory trends (i.e., normalisers) or highlighting its limited or even negative influence on political participation (i.e., pessimists). Similar findings also emerged in relation to social networking Web sites (SNSs), digital platforms that have been the subject of much research in recent years. This paper discusses how two assumptions characterising many studies focusing on the Internet, SNSs and political participation have contributed to the contradictory findings produced by optimists, pessimists and normalisers. The first assumption is the consideration of political participation as an activity aimed exclusively at affecting governments’ actions, either directly or indirectly. This conceptualisation has arguably prevented scholars from grasping the multidimensional nature of political participation and from assessing how the influence of the Internet on this phenomenon can vary according to the different types of political activity. The second assumption is the perception of the Internet as a homogeneous platform and an over-generalised notion of Internet usage. This, in turn, has led researchers to concentrate on the online/off-line distinction and to overlook the impact of different digital tools and various usage practices. This paper argues for a shift in the ways political participation, Internet and SNSs usage are conceptualised and operationalised in academia. It suggests moving away from the polarised debate between optimists, pessimists and normalisers, and adopting a more differential approach through which examining the effects of digital technologies on political participation
Citizen journalism · Epistemology · Internet privacy · Perception · Pessimism · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · The Internet · World Wide Web · Computer Science · E-Government and Public Services · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting · Law · Psychology · Social Media and Politics
Introduction. La participation politique en ligne au révélateur du pétitionnement électronique
The coup that flopped
The Impact of Civil Society on Governance in Lesotho
Windows to the World
Understanding the Magic of Credibility for Political Leaders
Soros’s soldiers, slackers, and pioneers with no expertise? Discursive exclusion of environmental youth activists from the digital public sphere in Hungary and Czechia
Ridiculed, but safe
Witty divas, nice mothers and tough girls in a sexist world
Nothing for the Girls? The Gender Gap in Political Participation on Social Network Sites
The Impact of Social Media Political Activists on Voting Patterns
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2016 - 2023 (8) |
| Highly cited | No |