The economic cost consequences of suboptimal infant and young child feeding practices

A scoping review

Bibliographic Data

ID15127293
AuthorsBriana J Jegier (0000-0003-2441-2010, Department of Health Administration & Public Health, Baptist Health Sciences University , 1003 Monroe Ave, Memphis, TN 38104), Julie P Smith (0000-0001-9796-7629, Australian National University), Melissa C Bartick (0000-0002-1287-3883, Department of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital , 330 Mount Auburn Street, Cambridge, MA 02138)
Year2024
Volume39
Issue9
Pages916-945
Publication date2024-10-15
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Policy and Planning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0268-1080 • E-ISSN: 1460-2237
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/heapol/czae069
PMID39087279
OpenAlexW4401207991
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited71

Breastfeeding is important for women and children’s health, but less than half of infants worldwide begin life with optimal breastfeeding. A growing literature shows consistently large economic costs of not breastfeeding, with global studies showing economic losses of around US$300 billion globally. However, existing studies are highly diverse in approaches, methods, data sources and country results. Building on a landmark 2012 UNICEF UK review focused on high-income countries, we conducted a scoping review to map and characterize the expanding literature and identify future research directions in this research area. We included studies (n = 36) in diverse country settings and outcomes for women and children. We used PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, MEDLINE, ProQuest and manual searches of cost of not breastfeeding studies published between 1996 and 2023. Articles were excluded if they were macroeconomic evaluations, did not assign monetary values or only evaluated breastfeeding or formula feeding costs and not outcomes or were cost of programs studies. We found considerable diversity in disciplinary approaches and differences in methodologies. Though there were different cost measurement perspectives (societal, institutional/payer and individual), all but two excluded the costs of unpaid care. Studies typically measured costs of medical treatment, with more recent studies using dynamic simulation models. The largest economic costs were derived from lifetime estimates of human capital losses, namely cost of premature death and loss of intelligence quotient points. Medical and death costs varied widely depending on method of calculation, but total costs consistently exceeded $US100 billion annually for the USA, and around $US300 billion in global studies. Our findings suggest that greater interdisciplinary collaboration is needed particularly to better define infant feeding exposures, and advance comprehensive measurement of costs and outcomes across lifetimes, in order to prioritize breastfeeding as a public health strategy of economic importance

Breast feeding · Breastfeeding · Cost–benefit analysis · Economic cost · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental health · Global health · Health care · Infant mortality · MEDLINE · Political science · Population · Public health · Breastfeeding Practices and Influences · Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Medicine · Nursing · Pediatrics

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access