Does the Medium Make a Difference? Two Studies of Writing With Pen and Paper and With Computers
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15216063 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christina Haas (0000-0002-9972-4759, Carnegie Mellon University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1989 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 149-169 |
| Publication date | 1989-06-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Human-Computer Interaction (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0737-0024 • E-ISSN: 1532-7051 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1207/s15327051hci0402_3 |
| OpenAlex | W1982683160 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 19 |
This article reports two studies examining how the use of computer technology affects writers' processes and resulting written products. The first experiment, a partial replication of Gould's (1981) study, compared the efficiency and quality of 15 experienced writers' persuasive letters written in three counterbalanced conditions: pen and paper, standard personal computer, and advanced workstation. Analyses of time to compose and length of the resulting letters showed that when composing with the advanced work-stations, writers wrote for longer periods of time and composed longer letters than when composing with pen and paper. Rate of composition (words per min) was similar in all three conditions. Scores for content quality, mechanics quality, and total quality were also collected and analyzed. Letters composed with the personal computer were poorer in content quality and total quality. There were no differences in mechanics quality. In the second experiment, 8 of the original 15 writers revised two of their letters in the medium with which they were composed. Think-aloud protocols collected while the writers revised their letters were collected and analyzed. When revising with pen and paper, writers planned more than when revising on-line; they also planned more before beginning their revisions. However, when revising in the computer conditions, writers reread their texts more and paid more attention to the medium than when revising on paper
Mathematics education · Computer Science · Education and Technology Integration · Literacy, Media, and Education · Psychology · Writing and Handwriting Education
The Apt Curation Model
Nuala O'Faolain
Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication
The Effects of Word Processing on Students' Writing Quality and Revision Strategies
Interacting With Hypertext
Comparative study on the effects of groupware and conventional technologies on the efficiency of collaborative writing
Human problem solving
Verbal reports as data.
Orality and Literacy
Exploring Exploring a Word Processor
What Did I Just Say? Reading Problems in Writing with the Machine
The Effects of Word Processing on the Revision Strategies of College Freshmen
The Validity of Using Holistic Scoring to Evaluate Writing
Physical and Cognitive Factors in Revising
Revising Strategies in Twelfth Grade Students’ Transactional Writing
The Fingertip Effect
| Citations per year | 0.18 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1992 - 2026 (35) |
| Highly cited | No |