Seeing (Movement) is Believing
The Effect of Motion on Perception of Automatic Systems Performance
Bibliographic Data
In this article, we report on one lab study and seven follow-up studies on a crowdsourcing platform designed to investigate the potential of animation cues to influence users’ perception of two smart systems: a handwriting recognition and a part-of-speech tagging system. Results from the first three studies indicate that animation cues can influence a participant’s perception of both systems’ performance. The subsequent three studies, designed to try and identify an explanation for this effect, suggest that this effect is related to the participants’ mental model of the smart system. The last two studies were designed to characterize the effect more in detail, and they revealed that different amounts of animation do not seem to create substantial differences and that the effect persists even when the system’s performance decreases, but only when the difference in performance level between the systems being compared is small
Animation · Cognitive psychology · Computer graphics (images · Crowdsourcing · Handwriting · Human–computer interaction · Motion (physics · Movement (music · Perception · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing · Psychology · Psychology of Social Influence · Technology Adoption and User Behaviour · Artificial Intelligence
An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior
Is the Web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from Web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments
Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words
Humans and Automation
Amazon's Mechanical Turk
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
A Bio-Informational Theory of Emotion
Intelligibility and Accountability
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being
| Highly cited | No |
|---|