Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Role of Cognitive Architecture in Modeling the User

Soar's Learning Mechanism

Bibliographic Data

ID15216280
AuthorsAndrew Howes (0000-0003-4251-1127, Cardiff University, corresponding author), Richard M Young (0000-0003-2289-6496, University of Hertfordshire)
Year1997
Volume12
Issue4
Pages311-343
Publication date1997-12-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman-Computer Interaction (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0737-0024 • E-ISSN: 1532-7051
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1207/s15327051hci1204_2
OpenAlexW2030860531
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited37

What is the role of a cognitive architecture in shaping a model built within it? Compared with a model written in a programming language, the cognitive architecture offers theoretical constraints. These constraints can be "soft," in that some ways of constructing a model are facilitated and others made more difficult, or they can be "hard," in that certain aspects of a model are enforced and others ruled out. We illustrate a variety of these possibilities. In the case of Soar, its learning mechanism is sufficiently constraining that it imposes hard constraints on models constructed within it. We describe how one of these hard constraints deriving from Soar's learning mechanism ensures that models constructed within Soar must learn a display-based skill and, other things being equal, must find display-based devices easier to learn than keyboard-based devices. We discuss the relation between architecture and model in terms of the degree to which a model is "compliant" with the constraints set by the architecture. Although doubts are sometimes expressed as to whether cognitive architectures have any empirical consequences for user modeling, our analysis shows that they do. Architectures play their part by imposing theoretical constraints on the models constructed within them, and the extent to which the influence of the architecture shows through in the model's behavior depends on the compliancy of the model

Cognition · Cognitive architecture · Cognitive model · Cognitive science · Human–computer interaction · Machine learning · Mechanism (biology · Programming language · Set (abstract data type · Soar · Variety (cybernetics · Computer Science · Human-Automation Interaction and Safety · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Personal Information Management and User Behavior · Psychology · Architecture · Artificial Intelligence

  • First‐ to second‐language reading comprehension

    Open Access•CATHERINE WALTER•International Journal of Applied…•2007

  • Introduction to This Special issue on Cognitive Architectures and Human-Computer

    Wayne D Gray, Richard M Young et al.•Human-Computer Interaction•1997

  • Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall.

    John R Anderson, Gordon H Bower•Psychological Review•1972

  • Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words

    Open Access•Jill H Larkin, Herbert A Simon•Cognitive Science•1987

  • The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension

    Walter Kintsch•Psychological Review•1988

  • Contextual correlates of semantic similarity

    George A Miller, Walter G Charles•Language and Cognitive Processes•1991

  • Task-Action Grammars

    Stephen A Payne, Stephen Payne et al.•Human-Computer Interaction•1986

  • Act-R

    Jared R Anderson, John R Anderson et al.•Human-Computer Interaction•1997

  • Theory-Based Design for Easily Learned Interfaces

    Peter G Polson, Clayton Lewis et al.•Human-Computer Interaction•1990

Citations per year0.07
Citation span1997 - 2007 (11)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae