Vaginal birth after cesarean or recurrent elective cesarean section
What are the decision making processes of pregnant women in Turkey? A phenomenological study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15217288 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Funda Çitil Canbay (0000-0001-7520-4735, Atatürk University, corresponding author), Elif Tuğçe Çitil (0000-0003-2815-7010, Department of Midwifery, Health Science Faculty, Kütahya Health Science University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 10-11 |
| Pages | 1500-1520 |
| Publication date | 2022-06-17 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Care For Women International (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0739-9332 • E-ISSN: 1096-4665 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/07399332.2022.2070624 |
| PMID | 35713394 |
| OpenAlex | W4283066788 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 36 |
What is known about deciding the mode of delivery after cesarean section (CS) is limited. Our aim was explore women's decision-making process since pregnancy. Constant comparative analysis was used in the analysis. COREQ checklist was used in reporting. The main theme was inability of having control. Four categories emerged; reasons for wanting VBAC, VBAC experiences, reasons for RCS, and RCS experiences. Women did not have an absolute say in their decisions. RCS experiences were defined as traumatic and VBAC experiences were defined as achievement that provided strength and pride. Findings contribute to the literature on increasing the success of VBAC the importance and encouraging healthcare professionals
Checklist · Interpretative phenomenological analysis · Obstetrics · Pregnancy · Pride · Qualitative research · Sociology · Theme (computing · Vaginal birth · Computer Science · Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions · Medicine · Nursing Roles and Practices · Pregnancy-related medical research · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|