Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Examining the Standardized Application of Rape Kits

An Exploratory Study of Post-Sexual Assault Professional Practices

Bibliographic Data

ID15217440
AuthorsDeborah Parnis (Trent University, corresponding author), Janice Du Mont (0000-0002-4851-1104, Health Sciences Centre)
Year2002
Volume23
Issue8
Pages846-853
Publication date2002-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Care For Women International (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0739-9332 • E-ISSN: 1096-4665
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/07399330290112362
PMID12487699
OpenAlexW2122391460
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited16

In this exploratory study we examine the practices surrounding with respect to standardization the administration and processing of the Sexual Assault Evidence Kit (SAEK). Despite the presumed scientific objectivity of this protocol, our survey of sexual assault nurses, physicians, police, and forensic scientists found that discretionary practices pervaded the evidentiary process. We argue that there must be greater awareness of the shaping of medicolegal evidence. Given the diverse characteristics of sexual assaults and of the health care needs of sexually assaulted women, we also suggest that it may be unreasonable to apply a single standard model of a rape kit

Criminology · Exploratory research · Medical emergency · Objectivity (philosophy · Poison control · Political science · Sexual assault · Sociology · Standardization · Suicide prevention · Clinical Psychology · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Law · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Medicine · Psychology · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies

  • Whose Credibility Is It Anyway

    Open Access•Gareth Rees•Review of European Studies•2012

  • Symbolic Power and the Institutional Response to Rape

    Open Access•Deborah Parnis, Janice Du Mont•Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue…•2008

  • There is No Place Like Home

    Sameena Mulla•Home Cultures•2008

  • Representations of Rape

    Open Access•Elizabeth Quinlan, Andrea Quinlan•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2010

  • Silly Girls” and “Nice Young Lads”

    Open Access•Lesley Mcmillan, D White•Feminist Criminology•2015

  • Whose rape kit? Stabilizing the Vitullo® Kit through positivist criminology and protocol feminism

    Open Access•R Shelby•Theoretical Criminology•2018

  • The Role of “Real Rape” and “Real Victim” Stereotypes in the Police Reporting Practices of Sexually Assaulted Women

    Open Access•Janice Du Mont, Kathy L Miller et al.•Violence Against Women•2003

  • The role of the specially trained officer in rape and sexual offence cases

    Lesley Mcmillan•Policing & Society•2014

  • Medico-Legal Evidence

    Open Access•Jessica Ritchie, Marianne Doherty•Feminist Legal Studies•2025

  • It is Not for Me to Say Whether Consent Was Given or Not’

    Open Access•Gareth Rees•Social & Legal Studies•2010

  • The ‘problem’ of abuse in Ontario’s Social Inclusion Act

    Open Access•Andrea Quinlan, Sandra Smele•Critical Social Policy•2017

  • Barriers to the Effective Use of Medico-Legal Findings in Sexual Assault Cases Worldwide

    Open Access•Janice Du Mont, D White•Qualitative Health Research•2013

  • Cultural Boundaries of Science

    Thomas F Gieryn•Cultural Boundaries of Science•1998

  • Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?

    Sandra Harding•Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?•2016

  • So Few Convictions

    Open Access•Janice Du Mont, Terri L Myhr•Violence Against Women•2000

  • Science as truth

    Open Access•Peter Atkins•History of the Human Sciences•1995

  • A Comparison of Group and Individual Sexual Assault Victims

    Open Access•Christine A Gidycz, Mary P Ko•Psychology of Women Quarterly•1990

  • The death of machothink

    Open Access•Barbara Roberts•Women s Studies International Forum•1984

  • Medical Evidence in Rape Cases

    Open Access•Jennifer Temkin•Modern Law Review•1998

  • The Social Construction of What

    Ian Hacking•Social Construction of What?•2000

  • Science as Culture, Cultures of Science

    Franklin, Sarah Franklin•Annual Review of Anthropology•1995

  • Science at the Bar

    Sheila Jasanoff•Science at the Bar•1995

Unique citing works12
Citations per year0,52
Citation span2003 - 2025 (23)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 12

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae