Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Development of the Labor and Delivery Outcome Scale (LDOS)

Validity and reliability of an intrapartal measurement tool for research use in developed nations

Bibliographic Data

ID15217860
AuthorsWilliam F McCool (University of Pennsylvania, corresponding author), Heather M Bradford (0000-0002-3664-4161, Georgetown University)
Year2019
Volume40
Issue5
Pages613-630
Publication date2019-05-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Care For Women International (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0739-9332 • E-ISSN: 1096-4665
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/07399332.2018.1545229
PMID31140941
OpenAlexW2947648918
LanguageEN
References cited18

Despite numerous scholarly attempts to understand and improve the health outcomes of childbearing in highly technical, developed countries, a theoretical and methodological deficit persists in regard to capturing a woman and her newborn's intrapartal experience. In an effort to construct a criterion measure and research tool that is not limited to one or two aspects of the labor and delivery experience, the authors created the Labor and Delivery Outcome Scale (LDOS). The LDOS survey was mailed to a nationwide, random sample of 1500 experienced U.S. accoucheurs, including nurse-midwives, family practice physicians, and obstetricians, and they were asked to rate 102 physiological and psychosocial events and outcomes along a Likert scale regarding their relationship to the overall intrapartal experience. The goal of this forced-choice format was to have practitioners quantify the quality of individual labor and delivery experiences. The authors received a total of 391 questionnaires, representing an overall response rate of 26.1%. On a scale of -16 to +16 the scores ranged from -15.7 ( SD = 1.5) for the outcome of infant born as fetal demise (stillbirth) to +12.6 ( SD = 4.4) for active involvement of support person(s) in assisting woman during labor. Reliability of the instrument was demonstrated with a Cronbach's alpha score of r = 0.92. Criterion-related validity was established, since the LDOS scores were significantly related to type of delivery (vaginal versus Cesarean-section), Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, gestational age, and the total number of labor and delivery complications experienced. The creation of the LDOS, and the subsequent testing of its reliability and validity as described here, has been an important step toward quantifying for research purposes the intrapartal experience of women in highly technical, developed countries. Potential uses for the LDOS are discussed

Construct validity · Cronbach's alpha · Developmental psychology · Family medicine · Likert scale · Obstetrics · Patient satisfaction · Pregnancy · Psychometrics · Scale (ratio · Vaginal delivery · Clinical Psychology · Maternal and fetal healthcare · Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions · Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology

  • Determination and Quantification Of Content Validity

    Mary R Lynn•Nursing Research•1986

  • The impact of state maternal mortality study committees on maternal deaths in the United States

    D A Grimes, DA Grimes et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1977

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae