Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Measuring Gynecological Morbidity

Evaluating Two Different Data Sources From Beirut

Bibliographic Data

ID15218355
AuthorsMary Deeb (0000-0002-4650-9967, American University of Beirut, corresponding author), Francoise Ghorayeb (United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East), Tamar Kabakian-Khasholian (0000-0001-5098-5483, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), Joumana Yérétzian (0000-0001-5805-4915, American University of Beirut), Naji Aswad, N M El Aswad (American University of Beirut)
Year2003
Volume24
Issue3
Pages254-265
Publication date2003-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Care For Women International (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0739-9332 • E-ISSN: 1096-4665
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/07399330390183561
PMID12746016
OpenAlexW2055381245
LanguageEN
References cited7

The lack of consensus over the most appropriate source to use in assessing reproductive morbidity could, in part, explain the inadequacy of available information on the subject. To outline this situation, gynecological morbidity data collected from two different sources in Beirut, Lebanon, namely, population-based health interviews (779 ever-married women aged between 15 and 49) and private gynecologists' clinics (867 women with similar characteristics), are described. Although neither source is likely to represent the true prevalence of gynecological conditions, both agree sufficiently to shed light on the importance of some conditions such as menstrual disturbances (15% in both samples), infections/inflammations (17% in the households sample), and infertility-related concerns (12% in the clinics sample). Interestingly, despite the demographic differences, the most common conditions that the women complained about and the most common diagnoses that the gynecologists offered were similar for both samples. Therefore, given that the logistics in the gynecologists' clinic survey were easier, we recommend the use of health service data in settings where a representative sample of providers can be identified and service use is high

Environmental health · Family medicine · Gynecological Examination · Gynecology · Health services · Infertility · Population · Pregnancy · Sample (material · Service (business · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Medicine · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Reproductive tract infections research

  • Reproductive Tract Infections in a Family Planning Population in Rural Bangladesh

    Judith N Wasserheit, Jeffrey R Harris et al.•Studies in Family Planning•1989

  • Self-Reported Symptoms of Gynecological Morbidity and their Treatment in South India

    Jagdish C Bhatia, John G F Cleland et al.•Studies in Family Planning•1995

  • A Community Study of Gynecological and Related Morbidities in Rural Egypt

    N Younis, Hind Khattab et al.•Studies in Family Planning•1993

  • Comparing Women's Reports with Medical Diagnoses of Reproductive Morbidity Conditions in Rural Egypt

    Huda Zurayk, Hind Khattab et al.•Studies in Family Planning•1995

  • Levels and Determinants of Gynecological Morbidity in a District of South India

    Jagdish C Bhatia, John G F Cleland et al.•Studies in Family Planning•1997

  • In search of truth

    Bulut Aysen, Yolsal Nuray et al.•Reproductive Health Matters•1995

  • Maternal health and the measurement trap

    Open Access•Warren Graham, Wendy J Graham et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1992

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae