Between innovation and industrial policy
How Washington succeeds and fails at renewable energy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15246296 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert Macneil (0000-0003-3700-2846, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 3-4 |
| Publication date | 2016-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Prometheus (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0810-9028 • E-ISSN: 1470-1030 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/08109028.2017.1323746 |
| OpenAlex | W2615745729 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 10 |
During its eight years in office, the Obama administration undertook an ambitious effort to transition the US economy towards the use of renewable energy technologies, and promote American leads in the global ‘cleantech’ industry. While many of the strategies selected to achieve these goals rendered positive results, others proved unproductive and/or politically toxic. Approaching the issue from a critical innovation framework (which focuses on the political and economic conditions under which the federal government is best able to promote technological change), this paper argues that the administration ignored some of the key conditions that have historically allowed Washington to succeed in promoting the uptake of new technologies. The paper describes the nature of these mistakes, and suggests an alternative way forward based on historical precedent
Administration (probate law · Business · Economic policy · Economic system · Economics · Government (linguistics · Industrial policy · Market economy · Political science · Politics · Renewable energy · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Engineering · Innovation Policy and RD · Law
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |