Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assessing the Refugee Claims of LGBTI People

Is the DSSH Model Useful for Determining Claims by Women for Asylum Based on Sexual Orientation

Bibliographic Data

ID15293266
AuthorsJasmine Dawson (The University of Melbourne, corresponding author), Paula Gerber (0000-0002-6292-6154)
Year2017
Volume29
Issue2
Pages292-322
Publication date2017-05-07
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Refugee Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0953-8186 • E-ISSN: 1464-3715
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/ijrl/eex022
OpenAlexW2738519404
LanguageEN
Citations received8

Although, in recent decades, the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex persons have been better protected, there remains significant room for improvement in the way claims for asylum based on sexual orientation, gender identity, and intersex status are assessed. Those claiming refugee status because they have a well-founded fear of persecution based on such issues continue to be asked inappropriate questions. The relatively new Difference, Stigma, Shame, and Harm (DSSH) model proposes that interviews to determine whether a person is a refugee should focus on eliciting asylum seekers’ perceptions of the difference, stigma, shame, and harm they have experienced. This model is being used by a number of States, and has been endorsed by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, but has yet to be the subject of rigorous scholarly analysis. This article seeks to fill this gap, and examines, in particular, whether it is an appropriate model for assessing the refugee claims of women seeking asylum based on persecution on account of their sexual orientation

Criminology · Gender identity · Harm · Lesbian · Persecution · Political science · Politics · Psychiatry · Refugee · Sexual orientation · Shame · Sociology · Stigma (botany · Transgender · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Psychology · Gender Studies · Law · Social Psychology

  • Proving gender and sexuality in the (homo)nationalist Greek asylum system

    Open Access•Zisakou•Sexualities•2025

  • Discursive Tensions of Credibility and Performance in Assessing Lesbian Refugee Claims for International Protection

    Open Access•Loes Verhaeghe, M Jacobs et al.•Journal of International…•2023

  • Credibility Assessment in Asylum Claims Based on Sexual Orientation by the Greek Asylum Service

    Open Access•Zisakou•Frontiers in Human Dynamics•2021

  • How Does Necropower Shape the Everyday Experience of LGBTQ+ People Seeking Asylum in England and Wales? Perspectives From Providers and Directly Affected People

    Open Access•Edward J Alessi, Lillian Alexander et al.•Sociology Compass•2025

  • The externalization of Australian refugee policy and the costs for queer asylum seekers and refugees

    Jaz Dawson•Australian Journal Of International…•2020

  • Feeling queer, feeling real

    Open Access•Zisakou•Ethnic and Racial Studies•2024

  • Decoding Sexual Orientation in Refugee Status Determination

    Open Access•Thomas Wimark•International Migration•2025

  • Trans migrations

    Open Access•Tai Jacob, N Oswin•Canadian Geographies /…•2023

Unique citing works8
Citations per year1.33
Citation span2020 - 2025 (6)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae