Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Shaping the discourse

What has the food industry been lobbying for in the Trans Pacific Partnership trade agreement and what are the implications for dietary health

Bibliographic Data

ID15294367
AuthorsSharon Friel (0000-0002-8345-5435, Australian National University, corresponding author), Sunil Ponnamperuma (Australian National University), Ashley Schram (0000-0001-5231-6291, University of Ottawa), Deborah Gleeson (0000-0001-8021-9130, La Trobe University), Adrian Kay (0000-0002-5854-4516, Australian National University), Anne Marie Thow (0000-0002-6460-5864, The University of Sydney), Anne-Marie Thow, Ronald Labonté (0000-0002-0615-740X, University of Ottawa)
Year2016
Volume26
Issue5
Pages518-529
Publication date2016-02-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0958-1596 • E-ISSN: 1469-3682
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09581596.2016.1139689
OpenAlexW2277438629
LanguageEN
Citations received20
References cited20

The Trans Pacific Partnership agreement (TPP), emblematic of the new generation of free trade agreements, is a regional agreement among 12 Pacific Rim countries. This paper reports on a study into how the food industry has framed issues in an effort to influence the TPP. We undertook a thematic analysis of the issues raised in publicly available submissions by the food industry to the trade negotiating bodies of four TPP countries: Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the United States of America (USA). The food industry is an active player in trade negotiations, mainly through food industry associations and other business associations. The submissions assumed that trade liberalization would result in more exports and investment, as well as raise living standards and benefit the economy and country. There was little mention of food as anything other than a commodity, focusing on types and quantities of food traded and what this meant for revenue generation, with no connection to nutritional health. The TPP could affect food systems and population health in ways that are not readily apparent to governments, policy makers or the public. The written submissions mechanism is one way in which the food industry could have shaped the agreement by framing the issues, influencing the content and direction of the TPP negotiations and agreement itself. If coherence between trade and health goals is to be strengthened, the public health community needs to engage with industry arguments and build a strong counter-argument that gives more prominence to health concerns

Agriculture · Business · Economics · Environmental health · Food industry · Food security · Food systems · Framing (construction · Free trade · General Agreement on Trade in Services · General partnership · Geography · International trade · Liberalization · Market economy · Negotiation · Political science · Population · Public health · Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Law · Medicine · Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies

  • Defining and conceptualising the commercial determinants of health

    Open Access•Anne Gilmore, Alice Fabbri et al.•The Lancet•2023

  • Industry submissions on alcohol in the context of Australia's trade and investment agreements

    Open Access•Mia Miller, Claire Wilkinson et al.•Drug and Alcohol Review•2021

  • An overview of the commercial determinants of health

    Open Access•Mélissa Mialon•Globalization and Health•2020

  • Stakeholder perceptions on the impact of trade and investment agreements on nutrition policy space in small island developing states

    Open Access•Noah Bunkley, Judith Mccool et al.•Globalization and Health•2025

  • Public health advocacy strategies to influence policy agendas

    Open Access•Billie Townsend, Brigitte Frances Tenni et al.•Globalization and Health•2023

  • Who influences nutrition policy space using international trade and investment agreements? A global stakeholder analysis

    Open Access•Kelly Garton, Boyd Swindurn et al.•Globalization and Health•2021

  • Situating commercial determinants of health in their historical context

    Open Access•Olivia Barnett‐naghshineh, Olivia Barnett-Naghshineh et al.•Globalization and Health•2023

  • Towards reconciling population nutrition goals and investment policy in Thailand

    Open Access•Sirinya Phulkerd, Ashley Schram et al.•Globalization and Health•2022

  • Characterizing ‘health equity’ as a national health sector priority for maternal, newborn, and child health in Ethiopia

    Open Access•Nicole Bergen, Arne Ruckert et al.•Global Health Action•2021

  • The interface between international trade and investment agreements and food environment policymaking

    Open Access•Kelly Garton, Boyd Swindurn et al.•Frontiers in Political Science•2022

  • How climate change interacts with inequity to affect nutrition

    Open Access•Leah Salm, Nicholas Nisbett et al.•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2020

  • Addressing trade policy as a macro-structural determinant of health

    Open Access•Helen Walls, Philip Baker et al.•Global Social Policy•2018

  • Implicit Messages Regarding Unhealthy Foodstuffs in Chinese Television Advertisements

    Open Access•Angela Chang, Peter J Schulz et al.•International Journal of…•2018

  • Power asymmetries, policy incoherence and noncommunicable disease control - a qualitative study of policy actor views

    Open Access•Battam, Billie Townsend•Critical Public Health•2018

  • A retrospective public health analysis of the Republic of Ireland's Food Harvest 2020 strategy

    Open Access•Tara Kenny, Mary E Cronin et al.•Critical Public Health•2017

  • An exposé of the realpolitik of trade negotiations

    Open Access•Sharon Friel, Phillip Baker et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2019

  • Trade and nutrition policy coherence

    Open Access•Phillip Baker, Sharon Friel et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2019

  • The role of causal ideas in the governance of commercial determinants of health. A qualitative study of tobacco control in the pacific

    Open Access•Dori Patay, Ashley Schram et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2022

  • How do actors with asymmetrical power assert authority in policy agenda-setting? A study of authority claims by health actors in trade policy

    Open Access•Billie Townsend, Belinda Townsend et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2019

  • Neoliberal discourse, actor power, and the politics of nutrition policy

    Open Access•Philip Barlow, Anne Marie Thow•Social Science & Medicine•2021

  • Gross Domestic Product

    Open Access•Douglas W MacKenzie•Wiley Encyclopedia of Management•2015

  • Food Politics

    Marion Nestle•Food Politics•2019

  • Big Food, Food Systems, and Global Health

    Open Access•David Stuckler, Marion Nestle•PLoS Medicine•2012

  • A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010

    Open Access•Stephen S Lim, Theo Vos et al.•The Lancet•2012

  • A new generation of trade policy

    Open Access•Sharon Friel, Deborah Gleeson et al.•Globalization and Health•2013

  • International trade law, plain packaging and tobacco industry political activity

    Open Access•Gary Fooks, Anne Gilmore et al.•Tobacco Control•2013

  • The incursion of ‘Big Food’ in middle-income countries

    Open Access•Simon Williams, Simon N Williams•Critical Public Health•2015

  • Patently obvious

    Open Access•Pat Neuwelt, Pat M Neuwelt et al.•Critical Public Health•2015

  • Trade and food policy

    Open Access•Anne Marie Thow, Boyd Swinburn et al.•Food Policy•2010

  • Agriculture and the State System

    Open Access•Harriet Friedma, Philip Mcmichael•Sociologia Ruralis•1989

Unique citing works20
Citations per year2,22
Citation span2017 - 2025 (9)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 20

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae