Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Electronic 1-year follow-up response rates of patients from the national registry for Ablation and Electrophysiology in Norway (AblaNor)

Bibliographic Data

ID15295247
AuthorsEva Torsvik (The National Registry for Ablation and Electrophysiology in Norway (AblaNor), corresponding author), Kristina Skåre (The National Registry for Ablation and Electrophysiology in Norway (AblaNor)), Mary Autenried (The National Registry for Ablation and Electrophysiology in Norway (AblaNor)), Torkil Grindstein (The Main Information Technology Partners and Providers for Hospitals in the Northern Region of Tromsø, Tromsø), Peter Schuster (0000-0002-2253-8827, The National Registry for Ablation and Electrophysiology in Norway (AblaNor))
Year2025
Volume35
Issue1
Publication date2025-11-06
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0958-1596 • E-ISSN: 1469-3682
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09581596.2025.2578551
OpenAlexW4415952430
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited12

High response rates at follow-up (FUs) are essential for monitoring clinically relevant outcomes via quality registries. Traditional methods such as paper forms or telephone FU are resource intensive. An electronic FU solution (“ePROM engine” at the Health Network) is available for medical quality registries in Norway, but its functionality and response rate are unknown. This study investigates the electronic FU solution in the National Registry for Ablation and Electrophysiology in Norway (AblaNor). ePROM FUs in 2020 and 2021 were examined. Anonymous data were analysed regarding sex, age groups, hospitals, arrhythmia types and comorbidities. Among the 7,169 procedures, 6,321 1-year FU forms were sent, of which 79% were answered. Response rates varied by age, sex, procedure type, and hospital. Younger women had higher response rates than men did, whereas older men had higher response rates than women did. Patients with atrial fibrillation had the highest response rates, whereas those with only electrophysiological examinations had the lowest response rates. Electronic FU one year after the procedure resulted in a 79% response rate, reflecting high digital competence and indicating its effectiveness and potential for broader application in medical quality registries

Ablation · Ablation Therapy · Atrial fibrillation · Catheter ablation · Electrophysiology · Electrophysiology study · Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes · Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments · Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

  • Accuracy in the Norwegian Ablation and Electrophysiology Registry

    Open Access•Kristina Skåre, Vegard Vavik et al.•Critical Public Health•2026

  • Response Rates and Responsiveness for Surveys, Standards, and the Journal

    Open Access•Jack E Fincham•American Journal of Pharmaceutical…•2008

  • Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires

    Phil Edwards, Philip James Edwards et al.•Cochrane Database of Systematic…•2009

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae