A Feminist Quality Appraisal Tool
Exposing gender bias and gender inequities in health research
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 15295559 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Tessa Morgan (0000-0003-4917-6149, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, autor correspondente), Lisa Williams (0000-0002-0398-993X, University of Auckland), Lisa Ann Williams (Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand), Merryn Gott (0000-0003-4399-962X, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand) |
| Ano | 2016 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 263-274 |
| Data de publicação | 2016-07-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Critical Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0958-1596 • E-ISSN: 1469-3682 |
| Editora | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09581596.2016.1205182 |
| OpenAlex | W2462582885 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 68 |
Quality appraisal tools used in systematic reviews to evaluate health literature do not adequately address issues related to gender. This oversight is significant because disparities between genders have been identified as a major health equity concern, and systematic reviews are regarded as a powerful means for informing policy that could redress gender inequities. In this paper, we present our Feminist Quality Appraisal Tool that offers researchers a template to undertake a comprehensive gendered analysis of studies they review. Informed by a feminist perspective, the tool addresses issues of power, gender and inequity, thereby giving researchers the means to interrogate the scientific rigour of systematic reviews that focus on gender. Specifically, our tool outlines ways gender can be critically examined in terms of study design, data collection, analysis, discussion and recommendations. We argue that this tool has the potential to improve the provision of public health by providing solid understandings and critical reflections on the reasons why women continue to face barriers in their access to optimal health care
Alternative medicine · Critical appraisal · Equity (law · Gender equality · Gender mainstreaming · Health care · Health equity · MEDLINE · Political science · Public health · Public relations · Redress · Rigour · Sociology · Systematic review · Gender Studies · Health Policy Implementation Science · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Systematic Reviews
The World Health Organization’s Health Promoting Schools framework
Taking ‘Women's Work’ ‘Like a Man’
Applying an equity lens to interventions
PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension
Critical Feminist Gerontology
Social Research
Feminist Research Practice
Appraising the Evidence
Better science with sex and gender
Intersectionality and the determinants of health
Extending systematic reviews to include evidence on implementation
Quantitative methods and gender inequalities
Feminist epistemology and the politics of method
The inclusion of quantitative techniques and diversity in the mainstream of feminist research
Feminist Gerontology and Old Men
Gender differences among Canadian spousal caregivers at the end of life
What Makes it Feminist
Gender Biases in (Inter) Action
Presidential Address
Tackling inequalities in health
Gender inequalities in health and health care services use in Catalonia (Spain)
Informal Caregiving
Engendering Health Disparities
A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data
Daughters Caring for Dying Parents
Gender differences in health
The postconventional body
Gender equity and socioeconomic inequality
Gendered Processes in Hospice Palliative Home Care for Seniors With Cancer and Their Family Caregivers
Beyond a catalogue of differences
Gender, health and theory
Gender differences in health
Women's status and the health of women and men
Doing Gender
Patterns of Global Gender Inequalities and Regional Gender Regimes
Interviewer and Interviewee Relationships Between Women
The Myth of Gender Differences in Health
Gender, Methodology and People's Ways of Knowing
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,67 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |