Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The case for the WHO Advisory Note, Global Nicotine Reduction Strategy

Bibliographic Data

ID15304537
AuthorsDorothy K Hatsukami (0000-0002-1108-2609, University of Minnesota, corresponding author), Ghazi Zaatari (American University of Beirut), Eric C Donny (0000-0003-3288-9652, University of Pittsburgh), Eric Donny
Year2016
Volume26
Issuee1
Pagese29-e30
Publication date2016-06-29
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueTobacco Control (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0964-4563 • E-ISSN: 1468-3318
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053134
PMID27357938
OpenAlexW2474842891
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited9

Cigarettes are the most addictive tobacco product and also the most deadly, causing the highest rates of tobacco-caused mortality and morbidity in most areas of the world.1 ,2 Although current tobacco control efforts have led to significant reductions in smoking prevalence, innovative strategies that can result in a more rapid elimination of cigarette smoking should be a high priority.1 ,3 In the US Surgeon General's report,1 reducing nicotine in cigarettes was considered as one potential strategy. In an article written by Tengs et al ,4 in which the authors modelled the effects of reducing nicotine in cigarettes on public health, taking into account a potential black market, the following statement was made: ‘Policy makers would be hard-pressed to identify another domestic public health intervention, short of historical sanitation efforts, that has offered this magnitude of benefit to the population’. Hence, the main goal of the Advisory Note, Global Nicotine Reduction Strategy, issued by the Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation (TobReg), was to provide a scientific review and examine the potential feasibility of reduced nicotine content cigarettes as an approach to tobacco control, and to describe the context in which this approach could be considered. This approach is bold, but worth serious consideration. Why? Because the tobacco control community has known for decades that the harms associated with smoking are primarily driven by its addictiveness. If the reinforcing effects of a drug are reduced, then continued use and consequently toxicant exposures will substantially diminish. However, this strategy is not suitable for all countries. As acknowledged in

Advertising · Advisory committee · Business · Harm reduction · Nicotine · Political science · Psychiatry · Public health · Reduction (mathematics · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Mathematics · Medicine · Nursing · Public Administration · Smoking Behavior and Cessation

  • Correlates of support for a nicotine-reduction policy in smokers with 6-week exposure to very low nicotine cigarettes

    Rachel Denlinger-Apte, Rachel L Denlinger-Apte et al.•Tobacco Control•2018

  • Medicalisation, smoking and e-cigarettes

    Kylie Morphett, A Carter et al.•Tobacco Control•2016

  • Strategies to Reduce Illicit Trade of Regular Nicotine Tobacco Products After Introduction of a Low-Nicotine Tobacco Product Standard

    Kurt M Ribisl, Dorothy K Hatsukami et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2019

Citations per year0.3
Citation span2016 - 2019 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae