Disaster risk governance in Africa
A retrospective assessment of progress against the Hyogo Framework for Action (2000-2012)
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 15306874 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Dewald Van Niekerk (0000-0002-4571-4205, North-West University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2015 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 397-416 |
| Data de publicação | 2015-05-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Disaster Prevention and Management An International Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0965-3562 • E-ISSN: 1758-6100 |
| Editora | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/dpm-08-2014-0168 |
| OpenAlex | W1559839082 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 9 |
| Referências citadas | 7 |
Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to provide a retrospective assessment of progress in disaster risk governance in Africa against the Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA) since 2000. This assessment of progress achieved in disaster risk governance in Africa aims to identify achievements, good practices, gaps and challenges against selected HFA indicators (in particular Priority 1). Design/methodology/approach – This study mainly followed a qualitative methodology although quantitative data were interpreted to achieve the research objectives. Available literature (scientific articles, research and technical reports) on disaster risk governance was used as primary research data. This research used a selected number of African countries as its basis for analysis (Burundi, Kenya, Mozambique, Nigeria, Swaziland and South Africa). By investigating literature on disaster risk governance an analytical framework was developed which guided the assessment of the achievements, good practices, gaps and challenges in implementing disaster risk governance on the African continent since the inception of the HFA in 2005. Findings – The research found that African countries have been making steady progress in implementing disaster risk governance against theoretical indicators. The continent contains a few international best practices which other nations can learn from. Certain gaps and challenges are, however, still hampering better progress in the reduction of disaster risks. There is the need for multi-layered ownership and understanding of disaster risks and their cross-sectoral nature, with strong community engagement. Originality/value – An assessment of progress in disaster risk governance in Africa can assist greatly in shaping future international and national policy, legislation and implementation. The research provided input to the Global Assessment Report for 2015 and identified opportunities in disaster risk governance beyond 2015
Business · Corporate governance · Disaster risk reduction · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Good governance · Legislation · Management · Originality · Political science · Qualitative research · Risk assessment · Risk Governance · Risk management · Social science · Sociology · Local Economic Development and Planning · Public Administration in Developing Nations · Urban and Rural Development Challenges · Finance
Surviving and Thriving During the Covid-19 Pandemic. The Resilience of Craft-Making NPOs in Alexandra Township, Johannesburg
Disaster policy framework analysis
Integrating Ubuntu
Governance, Institutions and People within the Interface of a Tsunami Early Warning System
Should all disaster risks be reduced? A perspective from the systems concept of the edge of chaos
Distributing flood shelters for disaster risk reduction
Good governance and local level policy implementation for disaster-risk-reduction
A normative model for integrating organisations for disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation within Sadc member states
Breaking the Silence
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2017 - 2026 (10) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 9 |