Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Pre-recorded expert evidence in intimate partner violence cases

Bibliographic Data

ID15310249
AuthorsJason Chin (0000-0002-6573-2670, Sydney Law School, University of Sydney, Australia, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume32
Issue4
Pages458-474
Publication date2020-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCurrent Issues in Criminal Justice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1034-5329 • E-ISSN: 2206-9542
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10345329.2020.1830505
OpenAlexW3093850946
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited29

This article makes a case for pre-recorded, modularized expert evidence as a way to improve access to justice in some intimate partner violence (IPV) cases. Knowledge about the effects and dynamics of IPV regularly plays an important role in criminal trials. This knowledge is often beyond the ken of the factfinder and thus can provide important context for the case facts. It may also assist in disabusing misconceptions surrounding IPV. Despite the potential value of this knowledge, several rules of evidence and the general nature of the Anglo-American trial process make it difficult to tender such evidence. For instance, trials prefer live testimony of expert witnesses over other means of conveying exogenous knowledge. These limitations place impecunious parties in regional areas at a disadvantage because they may struggle to find qualified experts. As a result, cross-examined pre-recorded modules about IPV (eg, factors that prevent individuals from leaving abusive relationships, IPV as coercive control) may be helpful in some cases

Context (archaeology · Criminal justice · Criminology · Disadvantage · Domestic violence · Economic Justice · Medical emergency · Poison control · Political science · Public relations · Value (mathematics · Computer Science · Crime Patterns and Interventions · History · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies · Social Psychology

  • Australia's Divergent Legal Responses to Women Who Kill Their Abusive Partners

    Open Access•Caitlin Nash, Rachel Dioso‐villa•Violence Against Women•2023

  • Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

    Open Access•Farhad Shokraneh, Carol Lefebvre et al.•Cochrane Handbook for Systematic…•2019

  • The weirdest people in the world?

    Open Access•J Henrich, Steven J Heine et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2010

  • Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

    Open Access•David Moher, Alessandro Liberati et al.•PLoS Medicine•2009

  • The Invention of Science

    Francis T Fallon, Francis Fallon•International Journal of…•2016

  • Coercive Control

    Evan Stark•Coercive control•2007

  • William Blake

    Dean Wentworth Bethea, Harold Bloom•South Atlantic Review•1991

  • Common knowledge in the common law

    Caitlin Goss•Current Issues in Criminal Justice•2020

  • Judicial decision-making and ‘outside’ extra-legal knowledge

    Kylie Burns, Rachel Dioso‐villa et al.•Griffith Law Review•2016

  • The expert witness’s duty of impartiality in Canada

    Open Access•Chris Hunt, Chris D L Hunt et al.•The International Journal of…•2015

  • Sexual Assault Law, Credibility, and “Ideal Victims”

    Melanie Randall•Canadian Journal of Women and the…•2010

  • Causal attribution across cultures

    Incheol Choi, Richard E Nisbett et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1999

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae