Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Parole populism

The politicisation of parole in Victoria

Bibliographic Data

ID15310344
AuthorsMonique Moffa (0000-0001-6858-4119, Criminology and Justice Studies, RMIT University, corresponding author), Greg Stratton (0000-0002-4807-0679, Criminology and Justice Studies, RMIT University), Michele Ruyters (0000-0001-9932-511X, Criminology and Justice Studies, RMIT University)
Year2019
Volume31
Issue1
Pages75-90
Publication date2019-01-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCurrent Issues in Criminal Justice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1034-5329 • E-ISSN: 2206-9542
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10345329.2018.1556285
OpenAlexW2913251526
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited19

Since the death of Jill Meagher in September 2012, political rhetoric has highlighted perceived issues with parole in Victoria, establishing it as an increasingly contentious issue in political debate within the state. The clamour to politicise parole in Victoria has been indicative of a broader trend in Australia, where a sweep of policy recommendations and recent reforms have seen a politicising of parole, such as the introduction of ‘no body, no parole’ laws. We contend a model of ‘parole populism’ has emerged in Australia that strips prisoners and parolees of significant rights, hampers rehabilitation efforts and fails to deliver on the promises made to the electorate. To highlight this, we explored the politicised framing of parole in parliamentary debates by employing a political discourse analysis of parliamentary debates in Victoria from 2012 to 2017. We argue the parole has become a focus of political debate in the name of prioritising victims, community safety and appearing tough on crime, which has resulted in divergence from the original purpose of parole

Criminology · Divergence (linguistics · Framing (construction · Media studies · Political rhetoric · Political science · Politics · Populism · Project commissioning · Publishing · Rhetoric · Sociology · State (computer science · History · Homelessness and Social Issues · Law · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Policing Practices and Perceptions

  • Post-sentence supervision orders in Australia

    Open Access•R Hogg, Lucy Crawford et al.•Punishment & Society•2026

  • Towards Human Rights Compliance in Australian Prisons

    Anita Mackay•Towards Human Rights Compliance…•2020

  • Parole as resentencing

    Open Access•Netanel Dagan•European Journal of Criminology•2023

  • The affective, atmospheric, and sensory dimensions of parole

    Open Access•Dwayne Antojado•Probation Journal•2025

  • Parole, parole boards and the institutional dilemmas of contemporary prison release

    Open Access•Thomas Guiney•Punishment & Society•2022

  • Governing against the tide

    Open Access•Thomas Guiney, Stephen Farrall•Theoretical Criminology•2022

  • Populism, Conservatism and the Politics of Parole in England and Wales

    Open Access•Harry Annison, Thomas Guiney•The Political Quarterly•2022

  • Structural competency in the post-prison period for people who inject drugs

    Open Access•Carla Treloar, Sophia E Schroeder et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2021

  • Building Public Confidence in Parole Boards

    Open Access•Robin Fitzgerald, Arie Freiberg et al.•The British Journal of Criminology•2022

  • Carceral Infrastructure Planning

    E Russell•Annals of the American…•2026

  • The Culture of Control

    David Garland•Culture of Control•2001

  • The Routledge International Handbook of Criminology and Human Rights

    Leanne Weber, Elaine Fishwick et al.•Routledge International Handbook…•2016

  • Victims and the Criminal Trial

    Open Access•Tyrone Kirchengast•Victims and the Criminal Trial•2016

  • Penal Populism

    Jeff Pratt, John Pratt•Penal Populism•2007

  • Law and Order Commonsense

    Delindus R Brown, David Brown et al.•Current Issues in Criminal Justice•1996

  • The ‘Focal Concerns’ of Parole Board Decision-Making

    Shannon Buglar•Current Issues in Criminal Justice•2016

  • Victims’ Versus ‘Offenders’ in B ritish Political Discourse

    Open Access•Deborah H Drake, Andrew Henley et al.•The Howard Journal of Criminal…•2013

  • Penal diversity within Australia

    Open Access•Hilde Tubex, David Brown et al.•Punishment & Society•2015

  • Beyond populist punitiveness

    Open Access•Neil Hutton•Punishment & Society•2005

  • From ‘Reluctance’ to ‘Exceptionalism’

    Open Access•Dianne Otto•Alternative Law Journal•2001

  • Appropriating the rights of women

    Selda Dagistanli, Sanja Milivojevic•Women s Studies International Forum•2013

  • Discourse, Politics and Policy

    Open Access•D Jacobs•International Migration Review•1998

  • The Road Well Traveled in Australia

    Arie Freiberg•Crime and Justice•2016

  • Is rehabilitation dead? The myth of the punitive public

    Open Access•Francis T Cullen, John B Cullen et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•1988

  • Deconstructing Victim and offender Identites in Discourses on Child Sexual Abuse

    A-M McAlinden, Anne‐Marie McAlinden•The British Journal of Criminology•2014

Citations per year1.67
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae