Perceptions on the Trend of Multi-Authored Collaboration
Results from a National Survey of Criminal Justice and Criminology Faculty
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15316447 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard Lemke (0000-0002-8989-456X, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 316-338 |
| Publication date | 2012-09-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Criminal Justice Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1051-1253 • E-ISSN: 1745-9117 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10511253.2012.719163 |
| OpenAlex | W2064304532 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 26 |
Perceptions of the collaborative research trend and personal rationales for authorship collaboration were examined in a sample (n = 542) of Criminal Justice and Criminology faculty members. Collaboration was pervasive across the sample with approximately half reporting that collaboration was involved in a majority of their published works. Generally, collaboration is perceived to be a combination of social research networks and more pragmatic concerns (ease of collaboration and increasingly diminishing time to do research due to university obligations). Results are disaggregated by academic rank, research orientation, and collaboration involvement. Preliminary evidence of a "culture of collaboration" is presented and discussed
Criminal justice · Criminology · Economic Justice · Perception · Political science · Public relations · Sample (material · Sociology · Law · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Psychology · scientometrics and bibliometrics research · Social Media in Health Education
Partners in Criminology
The State of Authorship in Criminology
The Current State of Criminological Research in the United States
Sticky Floors and Glass Ceilings
Trends in Top Journals in Criminology and Criminal Justice
A Content Analysis of the American Society of Criminology’s Presidential Address, 1988–2022
Breaking Out of Prison and into Print? Rationales and Strategies to Assist Educated Convicts Conduct Scholarly Research and Writing Behind Bars
Pragmatism and self-organization
Foundations of behavioral research
The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings
A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys
The Rising Incidence of Co-authorship in Economics
Re‐Assessing Publication Productivity among Academic “Stars” in Criminology and Criminal Justice
What Makes Them Tick
An Assessment of Criminal Justice and Criminology Journal Prestige∗
Journal publications of Ph.D. graduates from American criminology and criminal justice programs
A Preliminary Assessment of Small World Scholarship Networks in Criminology and Criminal Justice
Reexamining Criminal Justice “Star Power” in a Larger Sky
Assessing the Quality of Doctoral Programs in Criminology in the United States
Ranking multiple authors in criminal justice scholarship
Methodological orientations of articles appearing in criminal justice’s top journals
Trends in multiple-authored articles in criminology and criminal justice
How Many Authors does It Take to Write an Article? An Assessment of Criminology and Criminal Justice Research Article Author Composition
Re‐Ranking the Top Female Academic “Stars” in Criminology and Criminal Justice Using an Alternative Method
The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity
Collaboration and the Quality of Research
Who are the most-cited scholars in major American criminology and criminal justice journals
Intellectual Collaboration
Quantification and Multiple Authorships in Political Science
How Many Authors Does It Take to Publish an Article? Trends and Patterns in Political Science
Trends in Multi-Authored Papers in Economics
The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,64 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2024 (10) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |