Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Modeling cognitive antecedents of tolerance for black bears

The roles of direct experience, knowledge, and risk perceptions

Bibliographic Data

ID15326599
AuthorsJackie Delie (0000-0002-8814-3684, Oregon State University, corresponding author), Mark D Needham (0000-0001-6265-3371, Oregon State University), Kelly Biedenweg (0000-0002-9230-1315, Oregon State University)
Year2022
Volume28
Issue6
Pages564-584
Publication date2022-09-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman Dimensions of Wildlife (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1087-1209 • E-ISSN: 1533-158X
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10871209.2022.2098424
OpenAlexW4294556297
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited54

Understanding tolerance for wildlife requires accounting for the multiple cognitive antecedents of this concept and its contextual factors. We examined whether direct experience was associated with four antecedent dimensions of tolerance for black bears (antipathy, connection, lethal control [damage], lethal control [danger to self, pets, and economics]), both directly and indirectly via risk perception, self-assessed knowledge, and factual knowledge. We collected data using intercept surveys at trailheads in western Oregon, United States (n = 210). Risk perception was most strongly related to antipathy (cost-related beliefs) and connection (benefit-related beliefs) toward black bears. Self-assessed knowledge was most strongly associated with an individual’s assessment that bears are a nuisance (lethal control [damage] and a safety concern [danger to self, pets, and economics]). Direct experience was related to all four antecedents, whereas factual knowledge was not related to any dimension. Identifying drivers of tolerance can inform actionable recommendations that promote tolerance for wildlife

Antecedent (behavioral psychology · Antipathy · Biology · Cognition · Control (management · Economics · Perception · Political science · Risk perception · Wildlife · Animal and Plant Science Education · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology · Ecology

  • Experiences and emotional responses of farming communities living with Asian Elephants in Southern Sri Lanka

    Open Access•Shermin de Silva, Kirstie Ruppert et al.•Trees Forests and People•2023

  • A path to human‐raccoon dog harmony

    Open Access•Qianqian Zhao, Yihan Wang et al.•People and Nature•2024

  • Sociodemographic and regional differences in human–coyote interactions and human attitudes towards coyotes

    Open Access•Emily Zepeda, Elizabeth Elliot Noe et al.•People and Nature•2026

  • The wildlife attitude-acceptability framework’s potential to inform human dimensions of wildlife science and practice

    Open Access•Alexander L Metcalf, Elizabeth Covelli Metcalf et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2024

  • Flexible Imputation of Missing Data, Second Edition

    Stef Van Buuren•Flexible Imputation of Missing…•2018

  • Paying for Tolerance

    Open Access•Lisa Naughton-Treves, Lisa Naughton‐Treves et al.•Conservation Biology•2003

  • The impact of direct and indirect experiences on the development of environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior

    Open Access•Mat D Duerden, Peter A Witt et al.•Journal of Environmental Psychology•2010

  • Wildlife tourism

    Susanna Curtin•Current Issues in Tourism•2009

  • A wildlife tolerance model and case study for understanding human wildlife conflicts

    Open Access•Ruth Kansky, Martin Kidd et al.•Biological Conservation•2016

  • Conservation’s blind spot

    Open Access•Francine Madden, Brian Mcquinn•Biological Conservation•2014

  • Determining Where the Wild Things will be

    Open Access•Jeremy T Bruskotter, Robyn S Wilson•Conservation Letters•2014

  • Direct Experience And Attitude-Behavior Consistency

    Russell H Fazio, Mark P Zanna•Advances in Experimental Social…•1981

  • A Test of Missing Completely at Random for Multivariate Data with Missing Values

    Roderick J A Little, Roderick J Little•Journal of the American…•1988

  • Can Ecotourism Interpretation Really Lead to Pro-Conservation Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviour? Evidence from the Galapagos Islands

    Robert B Powell, Sam H Ham•Journal of Sustainable Tourism•2008

  • Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures

    Open Access•Nick Allum, Patrick Sturgis et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2007

  • Basics of Structural Equation Modeling

    Geoffrey Maruyama•Basics of structural equation…•1998

  • Finding our bearings

    Michael D Heneghan, Wayde C Morse et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2017

  • Wildlife value orientations

    David C Fulton, Michael J Manfredo et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•1996

  • Using psychometrics to characterize the cognitive antecedents of tolerance for black bears

    Jackie Delie, John Edwards et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2022

  • Risk Sensitivity and Hunter Perceptions of Chronic Wasting Disease Risk and Other Hunting, Wildlife, and Health Risks

    Mark D Needham, Jerry J Vaske et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2017

  • Assessing Tolerance for Wildlife

    Jeremy T Bruskotter, Ajay Singh et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2015

  • How Minnesota wolf hunter and trapper attitudes and risk- and benefit-based beliefs predict wolf management preferences

    Susan A Schroeder, David C Fulton et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2018

  • Human Conditioning to Wildlife

    Harry C Zinn, Michael J Manfredo et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2008

  • Social psychological bases for Stakeholder acceptance Capacity

    Harry C Zinn, Michael J Manfredo et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2000

  • Beyond the tolerance/intolerance dichotomy

    Lara J Brenner, Elizabeth Covelli Metcalf•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2019

  • Creating Landscapes of Coexistence

    Open Access•Guy Western, DavidW Macdonald et al.•Conservation and Society•2019

  • Human–Wildlife Conflicts and the Need to Include Tolerance and Coexistence

    Beatrice Frank•Society & Natural Resources•2015

  • Will Hunters Steward Wolves? A Comment on Treves and Martin

    Jeremy T Bruskotter, David C Fulton•Society & Natural Resources•2012

  • Specificity and the Cognitive Hierarchy

    Doug Whittaker, Jerry J Vaske et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2006

  • Using normative beliefs to determine the acceptability of wildlife management actions

    Harry C Zinn, Michael J Manfredo et al.•Society & Natural Resources•1998

  • Putting the fear back into fear appeals

    Kim Witte•Communication Monographs•1992

  • Perceptions of Knowledge, Actual Knowledge, and Information Search Behavior

    Open Access•Carmen M Radecki, James Jaccard•Journal of Experimental Social…•1995

  • A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy

    Pamela M Homer, Lynn R Kahle•Journal of Personality and Social…•1988

  • Tolerance for cougars diminished by high perception of risk

    Open Access•Aliah Adams Knopff, Kyle H Knopff et al.•Conservation Ecology•2016

Unique citing works4
Citations per year1,33
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae