Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Attitudes towards predation by domestic cats in UK nature reserves differs between conservation researchers and conservation practitioners and is affected by cat ownership

Bibliographic Data

ID15326601
AuthorsAilun Wang (0000-0002-4214-2352, University of Reading), Tara J Pirie (0000-0001-7346-0807, University of Reading), Mark D E Fellowes (0000-0001-5431-8637, University of Reading, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume31
Issue2
Pages206-221
Publication date2025-04-22
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman Dimensions of Wildlife (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1087-1209 • E-ISSN: 1533-158X
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10871209.2025.2492053
OpenAlexW4409678650
LanguageEN
References cited43

Domestic cats are the most abundant vertebrate predator in many regions, but the acceptability of management strategies to reduce their effects on wildlife among conservation researchers and practitioners is unclear. We conducted a survey of UK-based conservation researchers and practitioners, using eight key statements on cat risks and management strategies, and assessed whether cat ownership influenced attitudes. While both researchers and practitioners agreed that cats were harmful to wildlife and management was needed, researchers were more concerned about cats entering nature reserves and less supportive of trap-neuter-release (TNR) than practitioners. Furthermore, cat ownership affected perceptions, with cat owners less likely to agree that cats threaten wildlife or support management strategies such as building buffer zones around nature reserves. Together, both occupation and cat ownership affected attitudes toward cats. This study could guide future campaigns in designing management strategies for nature reserves to reduce the effects of domestic cats on wildlife

Biology · Business · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Natural resource economics · Nature Conservation · Nature reserve · Predation · Wildlife · Wildlife conservation · Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Ecology

  • Modern Applied Statistics with S

    Open Access•W N Venables, Brian D Ripley•Modern Applied Statistics with S…•2002

  • Pet cats (Felis catus) from urban boundaries use different habitats, have larger home ranges and kill more prey than cats from the suburbs

    Open Access•Tara J Pirie, Rebecca L Thomas et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2022

  • Domestic cats and their impacts on biodiversity

    Open Access•Arie Trouwborst, Phillipa C Mccormack et al.•People and Nature•2020

  • Communicating Judgments About Practical Significance

    Jerry J Vaske•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2002

  • Factors Affecting Student Tolerance for Free-Roaming Cats

    Dara M Wald, Susan K Jacobson•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2013

  • Wandering Cats

    Samia R Toukhsati, Emily Young et al.•Anthrozoös•2012

  • Roaming the Campus

    Eliza Ruiz Izaguirre, David Oseguera Montiel•Anthrozoös•2021

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae