Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Management options for a human‐wildlife conflict

Australian magpie attacks on humans

Bibliographic Data

ID15326603
AuthorsLeoni K Thomas (Griffith University, corresponding author), Darryl Jones (0000-0002-2565-9456, Griffith University), Danyl N Jones
Year1999
Volume4
Issue3
Pages93-95
Publication date1999-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman Dimensions of Wildlife (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1087-1209 • E-ISSN: 1533-158X
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10871209909359160
OpenAlexW1966360265
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited1

The management of dangerous wildlife often poses complex challenges for wildlife agencies. Managers trained to deal decisively with an aggressive animal, may he surprised and frustrated by public opposition to their actions. Community scrutiny of wildlife management practices and subsequent objections are growing in importance, especially in suburban environments, where a variety of wildlife species are now common residents or regular visitors.\n\nAn example of a controversial human-wildlife conflict is attacks on humans by Australian magpies (Gymnorhina tibicen), an endemic crow-sized passerine common in suburban environments throughout Australia (Jones & Thomas, 1999). People are injured each year, some seriously, when magpies attack pedestrians and cyclists passing the nest (Jones & Thomas, 1999). Traditionally, aggressive magpies have been shot and this remains the most common approach in rural areas (Jones & Thomas, 1999). Recently, the use of lethal control methods has resulted in considerable public outcry (Jones & Thomas, 1999). As a result, wildlife agencies are currently rethinking their approaches to this increasingly complex problem. An assumption made by many wildlife managers and agencies has been that community concern over magpie attacks is so high that offending birds must be removed. One of the useful contributions of human dimensions research to the practice of wildlife management has been to provide insights into these complex management situations by assessing manager's assumptions (Enck & Decker, 1997)

Biology · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Human–wildlife conflict · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Wildlife · Wildlife conservation · Wildlife management · Environmental Science · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Ecology

  • The monkey is not always a God

    Open Access•Shreya Anand, Shaurabh Anand et al.•AMBIO•2018

  • Animal-related attitudes and activities in an urban population

    Tore Bjerke, Torbjørn Østdahl•Anthrozoös•2004

  • Examining assumptions in wildlife management

    Jody W Enck, Daniel J Decker•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•1997

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0.09
Citation span2004 - 2018 (15)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae