Using policy goals to evaluate red wolf reintroduction in eastern North Carolina
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15326672 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christopher Serenari (0000-0001-9554-7479, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, corresponding author), David T Cobb (0000-0002-5483-2692, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission), Deidre M Peroff (0000-0001-7738-256X, Water Resources Institute, University of Wisconsin Sea Grant, Milwaukee, WI, USA) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 359-374 |
| Publication date | 2018-03-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Human Dimensions of Wildlife (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1087-1209 • E-ISSN: 1533-158X |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10871209.2018.1444827 |
| OpenAlex | W2794418085 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 31 |
Despite being politicized in its early stages, the Red Wolf (Canis rufus) Recovery Program (RWRP) existed for 30 years in eastern North Carolina with little attention paid to finding common ground between policy contestants. We situated our data from 62 key informant interviews within Stone’s (2002) policy goals framework to evaluate red wolf recovery in eastern North Carolina, United States. Four goals underpin U.S. political culture and offer common ground with which to begin negotiation among policy contestants. Our results highlight challenges to achieving one definition prescribing how to treat each policy goal. The future of recovery within the red wolf’s historic range could hinge on decision-makers’ willingness to prioritize policy design over policy tool evaluation, developing a process by which to achieve an agreed-upon set of values underscoring red wolf recovery. This process must reconcile disagreements about what is fair or equitable treatment of landowners and include local-level experiences
Economics · Environmental resource management · Geography · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · Situated · Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies · Forest Management and Policy · Law · Public Administration · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Reconsidering the role of the built environment in human–wildlife interactions
Red wolf science and identity storylines in an online discursive community
Applying Reiss’ expectancy theory to locals’ perceptions of a potential red wolf reintroduction to Ozark National Forest, AR
Delegitimizing Large Carnivore Conservation through Discourse
Determinants influencing recruitment in the Houston toad programmatic safe harbor agreement
Rancher perceptions of and attitudes toward Mexican gray wolves
Basics of qualitative research
Human‐Carnivore Conflict and Perspectives on Carnivore Management Worldwide
Status and Ecological Effects of the World’s Largest Carnivores
The foundations of policy analysis
Modernity and self-identity
Modernity and Self-Identity
Politics
Collecting Qualitative Data
Private land
The Politics of Policy Development to End Obesity for Aboriginal Youth in the Educational Environment
A critical review of efforts to protect Florida panther habitat on private lands
Wolf Recovery and Management as Value-based Political Conflict
The Greater Yellowstone policy debate
What’s Public? What’s Private
Naturalistic inquiry
Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries
Theoretical Sampling and Category Development in Grounded Theory
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2024 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |