Why the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation is Problematic for Modern Wildlife Management
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 15326710 |
|---|---|
| Autores | M Nils Peterson (0000-0002-4246-1206, North Carolina State University, autor correspondente), Michael Nelson (0000-0001-6917-4752, Oregon State University) |
| Ano | 2016 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 43-54 |
| Data de publicação | 2016-09-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Human Dimensions of Wildlife (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1087-1209 • E-ISSN: 1533-158X |
| Editora | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10871209.2016.1234009 |
| OpenAlex | W2527247932 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 19 |
| Referências citadas | 32 |
The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation (NAM) is a slippery construct, used both to explain how North American wildlife conservation developed and as a prescriptive framework. We argue both applications of the NAM are problematic. The roots of wildlife conservation in North America are more complex than those associated with the NAM, and minimizing contributions from diverse sources makes building a diverse wildlife conservation community more difficult than it would otherwise be. The NAM is not inclusive enough of diversity among wildlife species or stakeholders. Principles labeled the bedrock foundation of the NAM exist in flux and at the whim of political systems. Belief that the NAM reflects a foundation of laws more stable than the milieu of governance structures shaping wildlife management can encourage complacency among wildlife conservation advocates. Wildlife management exists in systems too complex to be beneficially defined by a terse list of principles
Biology · Business · Construct (python library · Corporate governance · Environmental ethics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Foundation (evidence · Geography · North American Model of Wildlife Conservation · Political science · Politics · Wildlife · Wildlife conservation · Wildlife management · Archaeology and Natural History · Computer Science · Environmental Science · Law · Rangeland and Wildlife Management · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Ecology
Complex human-deer interactions challenge conventional management approaches
Indigenous Resurgence
Multispecies livelihoods
An Integrated Ethnoprimatological and Economic Approach for Managing Green Monkeys (Chlorocebus sabaeus) in St. Kitts and Nevis
Vulnerability assessment of the multi‐sector North American bison Bison bison management system to climate change
The North American model of wildlife conservation is an inappropriate basis for formulating conservation policy
Back to the future
A multidisciplinary framework for research prioritization at the science-policy interface
Some Observations on Trophy Hunting and the Quest for Big Game Animals in American Society
African Rhino Conservation and the Interacting Influences of Property, Prices, and Policy
Elk management and policy in southern Greater Yellowstone
Conservation dressed in camouflage
Managing wild emotions
Once I found out
Applying Public Trust Thinking to Wildlife Governance in the United States
Agency mission statements provide insight into the purpose and practice of conservation
Violent Entanglements
Evaluating the Cultural Fit of Hunting and Angling Among Minority Sportspersons in North Carolina
Hunting for Justice
Structured Decision Making
Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived?
Boundaries of Science
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities
Environmental communication and the public sphere
Boundaries of Science
From clients to stakeholders
Public Trust Principles and Trust Administration Functions in the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation
George Bird Grinnell's Audubon Society
Assessing Attitudes Toward Wildlife Ownership in United States–Mexico Borderlands
Framing
Saving America's Wildlife
| Obras citantes distintas | 19 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,9 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2016 - 2026 (11) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 18 |