Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Why Namibian Farmers Are Satisfied With the Performance of Their Livestock Guarding Dogs

Bibliographic Data

ID15326840
AuthorsGail C Potgieter (0000-0001-5345-088X, Cheetah Conservation Fund, corresponding author), Laurie Marker (0000-0002-1636-2191, Cheetah Conservation Fund), Laurie L Marker, Nico L Avenant (0000-0002-5390-9010, National Museum), Graham I H Kerley (0000-0003-2702-5200, Nelson Mandela University)
Year2013
Volume18
Issue6
Pages403-415
Publication date2013-10-24
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman Dimensions of Wildlife (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1087-1209 • E-ISSN: 1533-158X
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10871209.2013.803211
OpenAlexW2057198732
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited21

The success of livestock guarding dogs (LGDs) in mitigating farmer–predator conflict relies on the perceptions of farmers that use them. Purebred LGDs are provided to Namibian farmers by the Cheetah Conservation Fund as a farmer–predator conflict mitigation measure. We examined the perceptions of farmers using 164 of these LGDs by analyzing data collected during face-to-face interviews from 2000–2010. Although most respondents reported reduced livestock losses since LGD introduction, satisfaction with LGD performance was more strongly linked to their observations of LGD behavior. The most commonly reported negative behaviors were staying home (29 LGDs, 18%) and chasing wildlife (25 LGDs, 15%). On subsistence farms, care provided was negatively correlated with LGD age (r = −.34, n = 35, p = .04) and LGDs reportedly staying home were provided with less care than other LGDs. Overall, LGDs performed satisfactorily on commercial and subsistence farms, and thus contributed to farmer–predator conflict mitigation. Keywords: livestock lossesfarmer perceptionshuman–wildlife conflictNamibia Notes Gail C. Potgieter is now at Namibia Nature Foundation, Windhoek, Namibia. The funding for Gail C. Potgieter was provided by the National Research Foundation and the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University Postgraduate Research Scholarship. The Cheetah Conservation Fund provided the logistical support to conduct the surveys. Gail C. Potgieter acknowledges Matti Nghikembua for preparing the map and Gephardt Nikanor for assisting with data collection. The authors thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier draft of this article

Agricultural economics · Agricultural science · Agroforestry · Animal welfare · Biology · Business · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Livestock · Pet therapy · Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies · Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology · Environmental Science · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Ecology · Forestry

  • Human–Wildlife Conflict 10 Years Later

    Laurie Marker, Laurie L Marker et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2015

  • A Community-Based Approach to Mitigating Livestock Depredation by Snow Leopards

    Rodney Jackson, Rodney M Jackson et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2004

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0.09
Citation span2015 - 2015 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae