Assessment of Deer Harvest Reporting Systems in the Eastern United States
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15327035 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James L Goddard (University of Georgia), Craig A Miller (0000-0002-3638-5665, University of Georgia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 458-459 |
| Publication date | 2009-11-25 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Human Dimensions of Wildlife (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1087-1209 • E-ISSN: 1533-158X |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10871200903061639 |
| OpenAlex | W1970454090 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 1 |
State wildlife managers use information from hunters to produce estimates of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) populations (Brown & Decker, 2000). Estimation methods include direct (e.g
Biology · Environmental protection · Fishery · Geography · Odocoileus · White (mutation · Wildlife · Wildlife conservation · Wildlife management · Census and Population Estimation · Rangeland and Wildlife Management · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Ecology
A State and Provincial Survey of Harvest Reporting and Data Collection Methods
Hunter use and satisfaction with telephone and internet harvest reporting systems
Harvest reporting compliance with telephone and Internet harvest reporting systems
White-tailed deer hunters’ perceptions of harvest reporting systems
| Citations per year | 0.44 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2024 (8) |
| Highly cited | No |