The precarious position of wildlife conservation funding in the United States
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15327178 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mark Duda (0009-0007-5536-8303, corresponding author), Mark Damian Duda (Responsive Management, Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA), Tom Beppler (Responsive Management, Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA), Douglas Austen (American Fisheries Society), Douglas J Austen (American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA), John F Organ (0000-0002-0959-0639, Scientist Emeritus, U.S. Geological Survey, Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Units, Reston, Virginia, USA) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 164-172 |
| Publication date | 2021-05-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Human Dimensions of Wildlife (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1087-1209 • E-ISSN: 1533-158X |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10871209.2021.1904307 |
| OpenAlex | W3158701594 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 2 |
The Pittman-Robertson Act was established in 1937 to fund state-based wildlife conservation through an existing excise tax on sporting arms and ammunition. Because these items were purchased mostly by hunters at the time, they were the user group primarily funding wildlife conservation. Subsequent amendments to Pittman-Robertson expanded the taxable items to include pistols, revolvers, and archery equipment, effectively broadening the pool of conservation funding contributors to include non-hunters. The continuing trends of declining hunting participation, increasing handgun sales for non-hunting purposes, and increasing sport shooting and target archery independent of hunting, mean that non-hunters are contributing a disproportionately greater amount to Pittman-Robertson funding than hunters, and therefore contributing more to wildlife conservation. The evolving sources of revenue to Pittman-Robertson pose several threats to this historically important source of conservation funding. Addressing them may require new funding coalitions and outreach describing the conservation benefits and outcomes of Pittman-Robertson funding
Business · Economic growth · Economics · Endangered species · Environmental planning · Geography · Habitat · Natural resource economics · Outreach · Political science · Position (finance · Recreation · Revenue · Wildlife · Wildlife conservation · Wildlife management · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Ecology · Finance
Le mentorat dans les pratiques de loisir de chasse et de pêche au Québec
Engaging adult R3 outdoor educational program design to strengthen participation in hunting and fishing
Determinants of away-from-home wildlife watching participation
Economic contributions of wildlife management areas in North Carolina
Some Observations on Trophy Hunting and the Quest for Big Game Animals in American Society
Taking matters into their own hands
Duck identification and regulation preferences among waterfowl hunters
Perception of mentoring among emerging hunters
The Environmental State
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |