Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Fostering human-elephant co-existence

A classification tree analysis approach

Bibliographic Data

ID15327593
AuthorsVincent R Nyirenda (0000-0002-3506-3912, Department of Zoology and Aquatic Sciences, School of Natural Resources, The Copperbelt University, Kitwe, Zambia, corresponding author), Darius Phiri (0000-0001-9593-4970, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, School of Natural Resources, The Copperbelt University, Kitwe, Zambia), Obote Shakacite (Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, School of Natural Resources, The Copperbelt University, Kitwe, Zambia)
Year2023
Volume29
Issue4
Pages366-381
Publication date2023-08-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman Dimensions of Wildlife (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1087-1209 • E-ISSN: 1533-158X
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10871209.2023.2243986
OpenAlexW4385583361
LanguageEN
References cited41

Subsistence farmers in elephant rangelands suffer food insecurity, economic losses and emotional stress from crop damage by elephants, resulting in reduced local support toward elephant conservation. To foster human-elephant co-existence in a dynamic social-ecological system, we explored the validity of Classification Tree (CT) analysis application to identify human-elephant hotspots in an effort to target approaches to reduce human-elephant conflicts. The CT analysis revealed that the most important factors affecting occurrence of crop damage were crop types, field sizes and distance to nearest road and river. From CT generated thresholds, we propose establishment of multi-criteria-based risk zones, as an alternative approach, to quickly identify and prioritize future human-elephant conflict (HEC) hotspots for improved agrarian livelihood and elephant conservation outcomes. We also explained the limitations of CT models. This study contributes to the existing theory and body of work on elephant habitat use at the human-elephant interface.KEYWORDS: Crop damage riskselephant conservationfactor analysisfood securityhuman-elephant interactions Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s)

African elephant · Agrarian society · Agriculture · Agroforestry · Asian elephant · Biology · Business · Elephas · Environmental resource management · Geography · Human–wildlife conflict · Livelihood · Rangeland · Wildlife · Environmental Science · Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation · Ecology

  • Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change

    Open Access•Pontus Olofsson, G M Foody et al.•Remote Sensing of Environment•2014

  • Spatial autocorrelation analysis of health care hotspots in Taiwan in 2006

    Open Access•Pui-Jen Tsai, Men-Lung Lin et al.•BMC Public Health•2009

  • Assessing tolerance for wildlife

    Open Access•P Virtanen, Valério A Macandza et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2020

  • Farmers' preferences for crop variety traits

    Open Access•Sinafikeh Asrat, Mahmud Yesuf et al.•Ecological Economics•2010

  • Reducing China’s fertilizer use by increasing farm size

    Open Access•Xiaotang Ju, Baojing Gu et al.•Global Environmental Change•2016

  • Experts and elephants

    Open Access•Erin K Buchholtz, Lee Austin Fitzgerald et al.•Conservation Ecology•2020

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae