Economic Impacts of Mississippi Wildlife-Associated Outfitters and Their Clientele
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15327718 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anwar Hussain (0000-0001-7131-1613, Mississippi State University), Ian A Munn (0000-0002-2872-5738, Mississippi State University, corresponding author), Stephen C Grado (0000-0002-8960-5414, Mississippi State University), James E Henderson (0009-0006-4302-1516, Mississippi State University) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 243-251 |
| Publication date | 2008-07-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Human Dimensions of Wildlife (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1087-1209 • E-ISSN: 1533-158X |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10871200802070970 |
| OpenAlex | W2115377416 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 3 |
Wildlife-associated outfitters and their clientele play an important role in local and state economies. Based on survey data of Mississippi wildlife-associated outfitters and their clientele, we simulated economic impacts induced by their direct expenditures at the state level and by species type (white-tailed deer—Odocoileus virginianus, northern bobwhite quail—Colinus virginianus, and waterfowl—Anas spp.). Results indicated that expenses incurred by outfitters in 2003 generated US$20.02 million in total industry output, US$8.80 million in value added, and supported 215 full- or part-time jobs, whereas expenses incurred by clientele generated US$1.88 in total industry output, US$0.95 million in value added and supported 32 full- or part-time jobs. By conservative estimates, the Mississippi wildlife-associated outfitters constitute a $10 million value added industry on an annual basis. These results should help prospective outfitters, planners and policy makers in the design of rural development strategies. Keywords: wildlife recreationnatural resource–based developmentinput-output analysisoutfittersIMPLAN Notes 1. IMPLAN (Impact Analysis for Planning) is a micro-computer-based, input-output (IO) modeling system. With IMPLAN, one can estimate IO models of up to 509 sectors for any region consisting of one or more counties. IMPLAN includes procedures for generating multipliers and estimating impacts by applying final demand changes to the model. 2. These percentages do not sum to 100 because some respondent outfitters engaged in multiple leasing arrangements. 3. IMPLAN data is full- and part-time employment (with the exception of the 1985 database). If an analyst is interested in reporting full time equivalent (FTE) jobs, data can be collected to translate the IMPLAN data into FTEs (IMPLAN Pro. p. 247)
Agricultural economics · Biology · Bobwhite quail · Business · Colinus · Economics · Environmental protection · Geography · Habitat · Odocoileus · Quail · Value (mathematics · Waterfowl · Wildlife · Wildlife management · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets · Ecology
Economic Impact of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation Expenditures on the Southeast U.S. Regional Economy
Economic contribution of hunting expenditure to the southern United States of America
Economic Impacts of Waterfowl Hunting in Mississippi Derived From a State-Based Mail Survey
Motivations for Becoming an Outfitter in Big Sky Country
A Hedonic Price Analysis of the Outfitter Market for Trout Fishing in the Rocky Mountain West
The Economic Significance of Hunting Tourism in East Lapland, Finland
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.38 |
| Citation span | 2010 - 2016 (7) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |