Do games work? A meta-analytic synthesis of gamified learning for clinical reasoning in medical and allied health education

Gamification is increasingly adopted in health professions education to enhance clinical reasoning, a core competency essential for safe patient care. Although many interventions report positive outcomes, the magnitude and consistency of these effects remain uncertain. This meta-analytic review synthesizes quantitative findings on the effectiveness of gamified learning on clinical reasoning in medical and allied health learners across diverse contexts. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science (2010-2023) for randomized and non-randomized studies evaluating gamified interventions targeting clinical reasoning. Eligible populations included pre- and post-licensure learners, with traditional or non-gamified instruction as comparators. Quantitative measures of clinical reasoning were required. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I, and standardized mean differences (SMDs) were pooled using a random-effects model. From 713 records, 26 studies met inclusion criteria and 10 contributed to the meta-analysis. Gamified interventions were associated with improved clinical reasoning compared with traditional instruction (SMD = 1.11; 95% CI: 0.69-1.52). Substantial heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 85%). Assessment of publication bias suggested possible overestimation of effects, with an adjusted pooled estimate of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.24-1.27). The certainty of evidence was rated as low due to heterogeneity, risk of bias, and potential publication bias. Gamified learning may support the development of clinical reasoning in health professions education; however, considerable variability across studies and low certainty of evidence warrant cautious interpretation. Future research should employ theory-informed designs, validated reasoning measures, and rigorous methodologies to clarify when and how gamification is most effective

Certainty · Clinical judgment · Clinical study design · Consistency (knowledge bases · Evidence-based medicine · Inclusion (mineral · MEDLINE · Psychological intervention · Warrant · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Educational Games and Gamification · Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare

• Deliberate Practice and the Acquisition and Maintenance of Expert Performance in Medicine and Related Domains

  K Anders Ericsson•Academic Medicine•2004

  Incluir item

• Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design

  Open Access•John Sweller•Learning and Instruction•1994

  Incluir item

• RoB 2

  Open Access•Jonathan Sterne, Jelena Savović et al.•BMJ•2019

  Incluir item

• Experiential learning

  Sarah Yardley, Pim W Teunissen et al.•Medical Teacher•2012

  Incluir item

• The PRISMA 2020 statement

  Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•BMJ•2021

  Incluir item

• From game design elements to gamefulness

  Open Access•Sebastian Deterding, Dan Dixon et al.•Proceedings of the 15th…•2011

  Incluir item

• Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice

  Open Access•Laura J Damschroder, David C Aron et al.•Implementation Science•2009

  Incluir item

• Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being

  Richard M Ryan, Edward L Deci•American Psychologist•2000

  Incluir item

• Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner

  Barry J Zimmerman•Theory Into Practice•2002

  Incluir item