Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assessment of cognitive biases and biostatistics knowledge of medical residents

A multicenter, cross-sectional questionnaire study

Bibliographic Data

ID15328740
AuthorsPavlos Msaouel (0000-0001-6505-8308, corresponding author), Theocharis Kappos (Memorial Hospital of South Bend), Athanasios Tasoulis (Alexandra Hospital), Alexandros P Apostolopoulos (0000-0002-4037-2429), Ioannis Lekkas, Elli-Sophia Tripodaki (Evangelismos Hospital), N Keramaris (Frontier Science Foundation-Hellas), Nikolaos C Keramaris
Year2014
Volume19
Issue1
Pages23646-23646
Publication date2014-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Education Online (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1087-2981 • E-ISSN: 1087-2981
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3402/meo.v19.23646
PMID24646439
OpenAlexW2089105945
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited39

A large number of medical residents are unable to correctly interpret crucial statistical concepts that are commonly found in the medical literature. They are also especially prone to the gambler's fallacy bias, which may undermine clinical judgment and medical decision making. Formalized systematic teaching of biostatistics during residency will be required to de-bias residents and ensure that they are proficient in understanding and communicating statistical information

Biostatistics · Bivariate analysis · Cross-sectional study · Fallacy · Family medicine · Logistic regression · Medical education · Multivariate analysis · Multivariate statistics · Odds · Odds ratio · Pathology · Statistics · Univariate · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Healthcare cost, quality, practices · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology · Statistics Education and Methodologies · Epidemiology

  • Paranormal belief and errors of probabilistic reasoning

    Open Access•Paul Rogers, John E Fisk et al.•Consciousness and Cognition•2017

  • Extensional versus intuitive reasoning

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Psychological Review•1983

  • The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement

    Open Access•Erik Von Elm, David G Altman et al.•PLoS Medicine•2007

  • Individual differences in reasoning

    Open Access•Keith E Stanovich, Richard F West•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2000

  • Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability

    Open Access•Valerie F Reyna, Charles J Brainerd•Learning and Individual Differences•2008

  • Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement

    Open Access•Erik Von Elm, David G Altman et al.•BMJ•2007

  • Changing Physician Performance

    David A Davis•JAMA•1995

  • Judgment under Uncertainty

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Utility, Probability, and Human…•1975

  • Statistics in science and in society

    Open Access•Fabienne Crettaz Von Roten, Yves De Roten•Public Understanding of Science•2013

  • The ‘conjunction fallacy’ revisited

    Open Access•Ralph Hertwig, Gerd Gigerenzer•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•1999

  • Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests

    Open Access•Lee J Cronbach•Psychometrika•1951

  • Antifragile

    Open Access•John P A Ioannidis, Nassim Nicholas Taleb et al.•Antifragile•2012

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,11
Citation span2017 - 2017 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae