Rectal-Specific Microbicide Applicator
Evaluation and Comparison with a Vaginal Applicator Used Rectally
Bibliographic Data
Alternative medicine · Anal intercourse · Family medicine · Gynecology · Health services · Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV · Introitus · Likert scale · Men who have sex with men · Microbicide · Microbicides for sexually transmitted diseases · Placebo · Population · Vagina · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk · Medicine · Psychology · Reproductive tract infections research · Surgery
Perceptions among Dutch men who have sex with men and their willingness to use rectal microbicides and oral pre-exposure prophylaxis to reduce HIV risk – a preliminary study
Factors Supporting and Hindering Adherence to Rectal Microbicide Gel Use with Receptive Anal Intercourse in a Phase 2 Trial
Preference of Oral Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate/Emtricitabine Versus Rectal Tenofovir Reduced-Glycerin 1% Gel Regimens for HIV Prevention Among Cisgender Men and Transgender Women Who Engage in Receptive Anal Intercourse with Men
Influence of Partner Type on Acceptability and Likelihood of Use of a Rectal Microbicide Among Young Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States and Puerto Rico
Acceptability of Three Novel HIV Prevention Methods Among Young Male and Transgender Female Sex Workers in Puerto Rico
Rectal Douching Practices Associated with Anal Intercourse
Acceptability of a Dapivirine/Placebo Gel Administered Rectally to HIV-1 Seronegative Adults (MTN-026)
Lessons for Rectal Microbicide Development From an Acceptability Trial of a Placebo Gel Applied Prior to Receptive Anal Intercourse
Women’s Experiences with Oral and Vaginal Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis
Acceptability of UC781 Gel as a Rectal Microbicide Among HIV-Uninfected Women and Men
Adherence to Rectal Gel Use Among Mainly Ethnic Minority Young Men Who have Sex with Men During A 3-Month Placebo Gel Trial
Acceptability of Potential Rectal Microbicide Delivery Systems for HIV Prevention
Codebook Development for Team-Based Qualitative Analysis
| Citations per year | 0.73 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2015 - 2021 (7) |
| Highly cited | No |