Buddhist Animal Release Practices
Historic, Environmental, Public Health And Economic Concerns
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15350238 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Henry C H Shiu (0000-0001-6214-3937, corresponding author), Henry Shiu, Leah Stokes (0000-0002-9919-8664) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 181-196 |
| Publication date | 2008-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Contemporary Buddhism (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1463-9947 • E-ISSN: 1476-7953 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14639940802556529 |
| OpenAlex | W2050542835 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 21 |
| References cited | 11 |
Animal release has long been a component of Buddhist practice, although it is little studied contemporarily. This paper examines the historical roots of these rituals, arguing that they may ultimately have been adopted into Chinese Buddhist practices. A short survey of contemporary Buddhist practice in various traditions is given, including references to important scriptural authority. Practices involving large-scale, ritualized animal release is then argued to have a number of unintended negative environmental repercussions, resulting in potential new, non-native invasive species. These practices are also considered from contemporary economic and public health perspectives, culminating in the argument that their compassionate intentions are often lost in the act. Acknowledgements The authors owe a debt of gratitude to a few individuals who contributed to bringing this paper to its present form. First and foremost, the writing of this paper was inspired by Master Tam Shek-wing (rDo rje 'jigs bral), a vajrācarya of the rNying ma school of Tibetan Buddhism who has been criticizing for years the potential problems of the practice of animal release. Our discussions with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, including Larissa Mohan, Joanne Jeffrey and Natalie Affolter, were central to providing potential solutions to the problems posed by animal release. Our thanks also go to Professor James Benn, Professor Guang Xing and Professor Duncan Ryūken Williams for reading an early version of this paper and providing invaluable feedback. Finally, Professor Sandy Smith of the Forestry Department at the University of Toronto was very generous with her time, and helped to clarify the biological terminology used in this paper. Notes 1. See the news in the local Hong Kong newspaper Orisun, 29 April 2006. 2. Taishō no. 1484, 1006. Duncan Ryūken Williams also mentions that Japanese Buddhist monks such as Keishu also took this scripture as the canonical source of the hōjō-e practice and commented on this passage in his Hōjō jissai katsuma giki. See Williams (1997, 150). 3. For a detailed study of the development of the practice of animal release in China, especially during the Ming and Qing dynasties, see Joanna F. Handlin Smith (Citation1999). 4. For information on Toronto see the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority ‘Live Fish Release Research Project’ report in progress; personal communications with Larissa Mohan; see http://www.trca.on.ca/. 5. In the case of Vancouver, there is evidence that a Buddhist temple regularly conducts the practice; see http://www.buddhisttemple.ca/involvement/international.htm; INTERNET. 6. See http://www.east.org.tw/01/link3-32.htm; INTERNET. 7. Sing Tao Daily, 1 November 2005, citing a report from the Guangzhou local newspaper Nanfang Dushi Bao of the same day. 8. Ibid. There is also an independent report on the practice of illegally introducing uninspected birds into Hong Kong from Guangzhou in issue 879 of Next Magazine (11 January 2007) (available from http://next.atnext.com/template/next/front.cfm; INTERNET). 9. See http://www.iucn.org/themes/ssc/publications/policy/invasivesEng.htm; INTERNET. 10. See http://e-info.org.tw/issue/biotech/issue-biotech00111501.htm; INTERNET
Archaeology · Argument (complex analysis · Buddhism · Environmental ethics · Gratitude · Sociology · Geographies of human-animal interactions · History · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Medicine · Philosophy · Psychology · Zoonotic diseases and public health
The neglected role of religion in fisheries management
Lessons from the Sanjie
The Ethical Obligations of Humankind towards Animals and Its Implications for Korean Religions
Official animal-release ponds in the Song Dynasty
Should Animal Advocates Support the Ritualized Release of Sentient Beings
What Mercy? A Case Study of Mercy Release in Hong Kong
Shown by the Marron’s Claw
Universal Karma
Xingyun’s Buddhist Environmentalism in the Context of The Contemporary Discourse on Fangsheng 放生
Relationships between fauna and people and the role of ethnozoology in animal conservation
Animal Release and the Sacrificial Ethos in Inner Asia
Special Section
A Chinese Buddhist Ecological Narrative
Liberating Party Animals
Turtles in Temple Ponds in Thailand
Buddhists Care
How to Deal with Dangerous and Annoying Animals
Animals in Japanese Buddhism
Buddhist environmental ethics and climate change
The Ethnic Ecocritical Animal
(Re)locating sacredness in Shanghai
Biotic Invasions
Effects of Biodiversity on Ecosystem Functioning
Chinese Buddhist Apocrypha
Would A Buddhist Freeze A Cane Toad?an Exploration Of The Modern Phenomenon Of Environmental Buddhism And The Ethics Related To The Doctrine Of Ahimsa (Non-harming)
Violence, Ritual Reenactment, and Ideology
Liberating Animals in Ming-Qing China
| Unique citing works | 21 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,5 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2026 (15) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 21 |