Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Buddhist Animal Release Practices

Historic, Environmental, Public Health And Economic Concerns

Bibliographic Data

ID15350238
AuthorsHenry C H Shiu (0000-0001-6214-3937, corresponding author), Henry Shiu, Leah Stokes (0000-0002-9919-8664)
Year2008
Volume9
Issue2
Pages181-196
Publication date2008-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueContemporary Buddhism (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1463-9947 • E-ISSN: 1476-7953
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14639940802556529
OpenAlexW2050542835
LanguageEN
Citations received21
References cited11

Animal release has long been a component of Buddhist practice, although it is little studied contemporarily. This paper examines the historical roots of these rituals, arguing that they may ultimately have been adopted into Chinese Buddhist practices. A short survey of contemporary Buddhist practice in various traditions is given, including references to important scriptural authority. Practices involving large-scale, ritualized animal release is then argued to have a number of unintended negative environmental repercussions, resulting in potential new, non-native invasive species. These practices are also considered from contemporary economic and public health perspectives, culminating in the argument that their compassionate intentions are often lost in the act. Acknowledgements The authors owe a debt of gratitude to a few individuals who contributed to bringing this paper to its present form. First and foremost, the writing of this paper was inspired by Master Tam Shek-wing (rDo rje 'jigs bral), a vajrācarya of the rNying ma school of Tibetan Buddhism who has been criticizing for years the potential problems of the practice of animal release. Our discussions with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, including Larissa Mohan, Joanne Jeffrey and Natalie Affolter, were central to providing potential solutions to the problems posed by animal release. Our thanks also go to Professor James Benn, Professor Guang Xing and Professor Duncan Ryūken Williams for reading an early version of this paper and providing invaluable feedback. Finally, Professor Sandy Smith of the Forestry Department at the University of Toronto was very generous with her time, and helped to clarify the biological terminology used in this paper. Notes 1. See the news in the local Hong Kong newspaper Orisun, 29 April 2006. 2. Taishō no. 1484, 1006. Duncan Ryūken Williams also mentions that Japanese Buddhist monks such as Keishu also took this scripture as the canonical source of the hōjō-e practice and commented on this passage in his Hōjō jissai katsuma giki. See Williams (1997, 150). 3. For a detailed study of the development of the practice of animal release in China, especially during the Ming and Qing dynasties, see Joanna F. Handlin Smith (Citation1999). 4. For information on Toronto see the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority ‘Live Fish Release Research Project’ report in progress; personal communications with Larissa Mohan; see http://www.trca.on.ca/. 5. In the case of Vancouver, there is evidence that a Buddhist temple regularly conducts the practice; see http://www.buddhisttemple.ca/involvement/international.htm; INTERNET. 6. See http://www.east.org.tw/01/link3-32.htm; INTERNET. 7. Sing Tao Daily, 1 November 2005, citing a report from the Guangzhou local newspaper Nanfang Dushi Bao of the same day. 8. Ibid. There is also an independent report on the practice of illegally introducing uninspected birds into Hong Kong from Guangzhou in issue 879 of Next Magazine (11 January 2007) (available from http://next.atnext.com/template/next/front.cfm; INTERNET). 9. See http://www.iucn.org/themes/ssc/publications/policy/invasivesEng.htm; INTERNET. 10. See http://e-info.org.tw/issue/biotech/issue-biotech00111501.htm; INTERNET

Archaeology · Argument (complex analysis · Buddhism · Environmental ethics · Gratitude · Sociology · Geographies of human-animal interactions · History · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Medicine · Philosophy · Psychology · Zoonotic diseases and public health

  • The neglected role of religion in fisheries management

    Open Access•Benjamin S Lowe, Susan K Jacobson et al.•Fish and Fisheries•2019

  • Lessons from the Sanjie

    Leah Kalmanson•Studies in Chinese Religions•2019

  • The Ethical Obligations of Humankind towards Animals and Its Implications for Korean Religions

    Open Access•Dominik Rutana•Journal of Daesoon Thought and…•2024

  • Official animal-release ponds in the Song Dynasty

    Open Access•Haoran Zhang, Lu Guo•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • Should Animal Advocates Support the Ritualized Release of Sentient Beings

    Katie Javanaud•Journal of Animal Ethics•2025

  • What Mercy? A Case Study of Mercy Release in Hong Kong

    Open Access•Rebecca W Y Wong, Rebecca Wong•Global Green Crime and Ecojustice•2025

  • Shown by the Marron’s Claw

    Open Access•Saskia Abrahms-Kavunenko•Journal of Global Buddhism•2024

  • Universal Karma

    Open Access•G Fisher•Journal of Global Buddhism•2023

  • Xingyun’s Buddhist Environmentalism in the Context of The Contemporary Discourse on Fangsheng 放生

    Open Access•Janka Balázs•Távol-keleti Tanulmányok•2026

  • Relationships between fauna and people and the role of ethnozoology in animal conservation

    Open Access•Romulo Romeu Da Nóbrega Alves•Ethnobiology and Conservation•2012

  • Animal Release and the Sacrificial Ethos in Inner Asia

    Open Access•K Swancutt•Inner Asia•2020

  • Special Section

    Open Access•Thomas White, N Fijn•Inner Asia•2020

  • A Chinese Buddhist Ecological Narrative

    María Elvira Ríos•Contemporary Buddhism•2020

  • Liberating Party Animals

    Susan K Mccarthy•The China Journal•2022

  • Turtles in Temple Ponds in Thailand

    Jenjit Khudamrongsawat, Dhanyaporn Meetan et al.•Society and Animals•2019

  • Buddhists Care

    Open Access•Yao Song, Zhendong Qin et al.•Religions•2019

  • How to Deal with Dangerous and Annoying Animals

    Open Access•Ann Heirman•Religions•2019

  • Animals in Japanese Buddhism

    Open Access•Barbara Ambros•Religion Compass•2014

  • Buddhist environmental ethics and climate change

    Open Access•Daniel Capper•Religion Compass•2024

  • The Ethnic Ecocritical Animal

    Open Access•Nimrod Baranovitch•Modern Asian Studies•2021

  • (Re)locating sacredness in Shanghai

    Open Access•Liz Hingley, Benoît Vermander et al.•Social Compass•2016

  • Biotic Invasions

    Open Access•Richard N Mack, Daniel Simberloff et al.•Ecological Applications•2000

  • Effects of Biodiversity on Ecosystem Functioning

    Open Access•David U Hooper, F Stuart Chapin et al.•Ecological Monographs•2005

  • Chinese Buddhist Apocrypha

    Robert E Buswell•Chinese Buddhist Apocrypha•1990

  • Would A Buddhist Freeze A Cane Toad?an Exploration Of The Modern Phenomenon Of Environmental Buddhism And The Ethics Related To The Doctrine Of Ahimsa (Non-harming)

    Cathy J Byrne, Cathy Byrne•Contemporary Buddhism•2006

  • Violence, Ritual Reenactment, and Ideology

    Jane Marie Law, Jane Law•History of Religions•1994

  • Liberating Animals in Ming-Qing China

    Open Access•Joanna F Handlin Smith•The Journal of Asian Studies•1999

Unique citing works21
Citations per year1,5
Citation span2012 - 2026 (15)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 21

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae