Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cultural variation in the smiles we trust

The effects of reputation and ideal affect on resource sharing

Bibliographic Data

ID15406327
AuthorsJulie Youko Anne Cachia (0000-0001-9584-457X, Stanford University, corresponding author), Elizabeth Blevins (0000-0002-6789-944X, Stanford University), Ying-Chun Chen (0000-0003-1365-9018), Yingchun Chen (0000-0001-9400-0308, National Chengchi University), Michael Ko (0000-0002-2273-7359, University of California San Diego), Nai-Shing Yen (0000-0002-7077-7400, National Chengchi University), Brian Knutson (0000-0002-7669-426X, Stanford University), Jeanne Tsai (0000-0003-4150-8268, Stanford University)
Year2024
Volume25
Issue4
Pages1025-1043
Publication date2024-12-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEmotion (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1528-3542 • E-ISSN: 1931-1516
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1037/emo0001450
PMID40244953
OpenAlexW4405906312
LanguageEN

When playing single-shot behavioral economic games like the Trust and Dictator Games, European Americans and East Asians invested in and gave more to targets whose smiles matched their culture's ideal affect (the affective states they value; Blevins et al., 2024; Park et al., 2017), suggesting that smiles signal something about targets' traits. But what happens when participants are given direct information about targets' traits; do targets' smiles still matter for resource sharing? To answer this question, we conducted four studies from 2019 to 2022 in which 429 European Americans and 413 Taiwanese played single-shot Trust Games with open, toothy "excited" smiling targets, closed "calm" smiling targets, and nonsmiling "neutral" targets that varied in their reputations for being trustworthy, competent, and emotionally stable. When targets' reputations were ambiguous (e.g., "50% of previous players said they were trustworthy"), European American and Taiwanese participants invested more in targets whose smiles matched their culture's ideal affect. However, when targets' reputations were clearly good (e.g., "80% of previous players said they were trustworthy") or bad (e.g., "20% of previous players said they were trustworthy"), European Americans invested equally in all targets, suggesting that reputational information about targets' traits mattered more than targets' smiles. The pattern for Taiwanese, however, differed: Taiwanese invested equally in calm and neutral targets when targets' reputations were clear, but regardless of their reputations, Taiwanese invested in excited targets the least . We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding cultural differences in the meaning of an excited smile in the context of resource sharing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)

Affect (linguistics · Ideal (ethics · Political science · Reputation · Resource (disambiguation · Sociology · Variation (astronomy · Communication · Computer Science · Cultural Differences and Values · Knowledge Management and Sharing · Psychology · Social Psychology

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae