A diffusion model account of the relationship between the emotional flanker task and rumination and depression
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15407762 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Madeline Pe (0009-0005-2531-0050, KU Leuven, corresponding author), Madeline Lee Pe, Joachim Vandekerckhove (0000-0003-2600-5937, University of California, Irvine), Peter Kuppens (0000-0002-2363-2356, KU Leuven) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 739-747 |
| Publication date | 2013-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Emotion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1528-3542 • E-ISSN: 1931-1516 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1037/a0031628 |
| PMID | 23527499 |
| OpenAlex | W2102156608 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 14 |
Although there exists a consensus that depression is characterized by preferential processing of negative information, empirical findings to support the association between depression and rumination on the one hand and selective attention for negative stimuli on the other hand have been elusive. We argue that one of the reasons for the inconsistent findings may be the use of aggregate measures of response times and accuracies to measure attentional bias. Diffusion model analysis allows to partial out the information processing component from other components that comprise the decision-making process. In this study, we applied a diffusion model to an emotional flanker task. Results revealed that when focusing on a negative target, both rumination and depression were associated with facilitated processing due to negative distracters, whereas only rumination was associated with less interference by positive distracters. After controlling for depression scores, rumination still predicted attentional bias for negative information, but depression scores were no longer predictive after controlling for rumination. Consistent with elusive findings in the literature, we did not find this pattern of results when using accuracy scores or mean response times. Our results suggest that rumination accounts for the attentional bias for negative information found in depression
Association (psychology · Attentional bias · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Depression (economics · Developmental psychology · Information processing · Negative information · Psychotherapist · Rumination · Task (project management · Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Mental Health Research Topics · Neuroscience · Psychology
Reflecting on rumination
Modeling and Analysis of Mood Dynamics in the Bipolar Spectrum
Current mood influences biases for positive and negative stimuli
Philosophical theorising about the rumination of depression
Decision making in numeracy tasks with spatially continuous scales
Attention control ability, mood state, and emotional regulation ability partially affect executive control of attention on task-irrelevant emotional stimuli
Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness Against Null Hypothesis Significance Testing
Rapid temporal accumulation in spider fear
Caution follows fear
Maladaptive task-unrelated thoughts
Affective updating ability and stressful events interact to prospectively predict increases in depressive symptoms over time
How does the emotional experience evolve? Feeling generation as evidence accumulation
Rumination Reconsidered
Cognition and Depression
Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task
Neural mechanisms of the cognitive model of depression
A theory of memory retrieval.
The Relations Among Inhibition and Interference Control Functions
Attentional Biases for Negative Interpersonal Stimuli in Clinical Depression.
Cognitive Vulnerability to Emotional Disorders
Understanding depressive rumination from a cognitive science perspective
Cognitive Approaches to Emotion and Emotional Disorders
The CES-D Scale
Anxiety enhances threat processing without competition among multiple inputs
Flanker effects with faces may depend on perceptual as well as emotional differences
Modulation of Focused Attention by Faces Expressing Emotion
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,09 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2026 (12) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |